- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 2 January 2024
- Bench
- Robin Phukan
- Case no.
- I.A.(Crl.) 981/2023
Judgment
ORDER Date : 03.01.2024
Heard Ms. S. Chakravarty, learned counsel for the applicants. Also heard Mr. B.B. Gogoi, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State respondent.
¶2This interlocutory application is filed by the seven applicants, namely, M/s K.S. Oils Ltd., Sri Kishore Kumar Garg, Sri Om Prakash Garg, Sri Mohan Lal Garg, Sri Ramesh Garg, Sri Gobinda Garg and Sri Gopal Garg for correction of the typographical error that occurred in the judgment dated 30.05.2022 passed by this Court in Crl.Rev.P. No. 151/2020.
¶3Ms. Chakravarty, learned counsel for the applicants submits that in the judgment dated 30.05.2022, in Crl.Rev.P. No. 151/2020, this Court, while allowing the said revision petition, in paragraph Nos. 1, 2, 4, 16 and 19 the number of C.R. Case has been mentioned as 2834/2001 and in fact the same ought to have been 1200/2002 and therefore, Ms. Chakravarty contends that above typographical mistake may be corrected.
¶4Mr. B.B. Gogoi, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor also submits that in the Page No.# 3/3 judgment dated 30.05.2022 in the aforementioned paragraphs, the number of C.R. Case has been mentioned as 2834/2001 instead of 1200/2002.
¶5Having heard the submission of learned Advocates of both the sides, I have gone through this application, the documents placed on record and the judgment dated 30.05.2022 passed by this Court in Crl.Rev.P. No. 151/2020.
¶6It appears that the number of C.R. Case has been mentioned in the aforesaid judgment as 2834/2001 instead of 1200/2002 in paragraphs No. 1, 2, 4, 16 and 19.
¶7Accordingly, it is provided that the number of the C.R. Case in the aforesaid judgment shall be read as 1200/2002, instead of 2834/2001, for all purpose.
¶8In terms of the above, this interlocutory application stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010228502023 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oI.A.(Crl.)/981/2023o M/SoK.S.oOILSoLTD.oANDo6oORS.o AoCOMPANYoWITHINoTHEoMEANINGoOFoTHEoCOMPANIESoACT,o1956oANDo HAVINGoITSoREGD.oOFFICEoAToMORENAo476001,oMADHYAoPRADESHoREP.o BYoSRIoKAPILoJHA. 2:oKISHOREoKUMARoGARG oS/O.oLT.oGACHALALoGARG oDIRECTOR oM/SoK.S.oOILSoLTD. 3:oMOHANLALoGARG oS/O.oLT.oTOTARAMoRAMoGARG oDIRECTOR oM/SoK.S.oOILSoLTD. 4:oRAMESHoGARG oS/O.oLT.oTOTARAMoGARG oDIRECTOR oM/SoK.S.oOILSoLTD. 5:oGOBINDAoGARG oS/O.oLT.oTOTARAMoGARG oDIRECTOR oM/SoK.S.oOILSoLTD. 6:oGOPALoGARG oS/O.oLT.oTOTARAMoGARG oDIRECTOR oM/SoK.S.oOILSoLTDo VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoANDoANR.o REP.oBYoPP,oASSAM. Page No.# 2/3 2:H. C. KALITA FOOD INSPECTOR KAMRUP GHY. OFFICE OF THE JOINT DIRECTOR HEALTH SERVICE KAMRUP GHY Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. S CHAKRAVARTY Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.