- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 7 April 2024
- Bench
- Manish Choudhury
- Case no.
- AB 3468/2023
Judgment
ORDER
08.04.2024
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner today on call. When the bail application was listed on the previous two occasions, that is, 05.02.204 and 27.02.2024, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on those occasions also. Ms. S.H. Bora, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam has submitted, on Page No.# 2/2 instruction, that a charge sheet under Section 173[2], CrPC in connection with Sivasagar Case no. 13/2023 has already been submitted on 31.10.2023. In view of non-representation on behalf of the petitioner on three consecutive occasions, this Court persuaded to take a view that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the present bail application. The bail application stands accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010229342023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/3468/2023 SHARIFUL ISLAM S/O LT. ABDUL HAMID R/O VILL- BHAGAMUR (PART) P.S. SAMAGURI DIST. NAGAON, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. T CHUTIA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.