VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2023 › High Court of Gauhati

Jorina Khatun @ Jarina Khatun v. The Union of India and 5 Ors

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
9 May 2023
Bench
Achintya Malla Bujor Barua, Robin Phukan
Case no.
WP(C) 7294/2022

Judgment

ORDER

09.05.2023 (AM Bujor Barua, J)

Heard Mr. MI Hussain, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. L Devi, learned CGC for the respondents in the Union of India as well as for the authorities under the NRC, Mr. AI Ali, learned counsel for the authorities under the Election Commission of India, Mr. G Sharma, learned Special Standing Counsel, Foreigners Tribunal for the Home Department, Government of Assam as well as the Deputy Commissioner of Police (Border), Kamrup(M) and Ms. U Das, learned Government Advocate for the Deputy Commissioner, Kamrup(M).

¶2The petitioner, Jorina Khatun @ Jarina Khatun, was referred to the Foreigners Tribunal No.6th at Goalpara, for rendering an opinion as to whether she is a person who had entered the State of Assam on or after 25.03.1971 resulting in the registration of Case No.F.T(6)-1088/GLP/19 wherein an opinion Page No.# 3/5 dated 31.03.2022 was rendered declaring the petitioner to be a person who had entered the State of Assam from the specified territory on or after 25.03.1971.

¶3Being aggrieved this writ petition is instituted.

¶4The petitioner relies upon the voters list of 1966 of village Tarangajhar, P.S. South Salmara, in the present South Salmara Mankachar district which contains the name of Asmotullah, son of Binod at Sl.No.215 and that of Sorful Bibi wife of Asmotullah at Sl.No.216 where both are shown to be residing in the same House No.88.

¶5The petitioner thereafter relies upon the voters list of 1979 of village Tharangajhar which contains the name of Sarful Bibi wife of Azmat Ali at Sl.No.212 and that of Juran Ali, son of Azmat Ali at Sl.No.213. It is claimed that Juran Ali is the father of the petitioner by showing that the name of Juran Ali and Sarful Bibi appearing in the same voters list and again the name of Sarful Bibi appears in the voters list of 1966 of village Tarangajhar. Accordingly it is stated that the citizenship of Juran Ali can also be determined. The petitioner thereafter relies upon a Kabinama which contains the information that Jorina Khatun is the daughter of Juran Ali of village Tarangajhar. But it is stated that the Kazi who had issued the Kabinama had not been examined.

¶6In the aforesaid circumstance, the matter stands remanded back to the Tribunal to enable the petitioner to examine the Kazi who had issued the Kabinama by producing the original marriage register. The respondents, in the Page No.# 4/5 Home Department, may also make their own verification as to whether Juran Ali referred in the Kabinama and the Juran Ali of the 1979 voters list of village Tharangajhar are one and the same person.

¶7Accordingly, the petitioner shall appear before the Tribunal on 17.06.2023. The petitioner may also adduce any further evidence to establish her case, if so advised.

¶8The Tribunal upon doing the needful and after examining the evidences and materials shall pass a reasoned order. In the event, the reasoned order is in favour of the petitioner, the same shall prevail over the opinion dated

31.03.2022 of the Foreigners Tribunal No.6th at Goalpara in Case No.F.T(6)- 1088/GLP/19 and if it is against the petitioner, consequential action under the law shall follow.

¶9Till the reasoned order is passed, no coercive action be taken against the petitioner.

¶10Writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms.

¶11Send back the LCR.

JUDGE JUDGE Page No.# 5/5 Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

PageoNo.#o1/5 GAHC010229602022 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/7294/2022o JORINAoKHATUNo@oJARINAoKHATUNo D/O-oLT.oJURANoALI,oW/O-oLUTFARoRAHMAN,oVILL-oKHALISABHITA,oP.S.o LAKHIPUR,oDIST.-oGOALPARA,oASSAM VERSUSo THEoUNIONoOFoINDIAoANDo5oORSo REP.oBYoTHEoSECY.oTOoTHEoGOVT.oOFoINDIA,oHOMEoDEPTT.,oNEWoDELHI-1 2:THEoSTATEoOFoASSAM oREP.oBYoTHEoCOMM.oANDoSECY.oTOoTHEoGOVT.oOFoASSAM oHOMEoDEPTT. oDISPUR oGHY-06 3:THEoELECTIONoCOMMISSIONoOFoINDIA oNIRVACHANoSADAN oASHOKoROAD oNEWoDELHI oPIN-o110001 4:THEoDY.oCOMMISSIONER oKAMRUPo(M) oDIST.-oKAMRUPo(M) oASSAM oPIN-o781031 5:THEoDY.oCOMMISSIONERoOFoPOLICEo(B) oKAMRUPo(M) oDIST.-oKAMRUPo(M) oASSAM oPIN-o781031 Page No.# 2/5 6:THE STATE COORDINATOR NATIONAL REGISTRATION OF CITIZEN ASSAM BHANGAGARH GHY-0 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M I HUSSAIN Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.