Tayeb Ali and Anr v. The State of Assam

ORDER

04.12.2024 Mr. A. Alom, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that charge-sheet has been filed before the Competent Court being C.S No. 154/2024 dated

24.09.2024. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not wish to press the anticipatory bail petition any further. Therefore, he would like to approach the competent trial Court before which the charge-sheet, as referred above, has been filed. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application stands dismissed as not pressed and the petitioner is permitted to file necessary bail application before the Competent Court before which the charge-sheet has been filed. In the event any such bail petition is filed, the Competent Court will examine the bail petition as its own merit and pass necessary order keeping in view the Judgment of the Apex Court in Siddharth Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Anr, reported in (2022) 1 SCC 676.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

PageoNo.#o1/2 GAHC010229742024 ooooooo undefined ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oAB/2918/2024o TAYEBoALIoANDoANRo S/OoJAMANoALIo VILL-oCHOUTAKIoPT.oIo P.O.oSALAKATIo P.S.oKOKRAJHARo DIST.oKOKRAJHAR,oASSAM 2:oSAHAJAMALoALI oS/OoMAGREBoALIo VILL-oCHOUTAKIoPT.Io P.O.oSALAKATIo P.S.oKOKRAJHARo DIST.oKOKRAJHAR oASSAo VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMo REPoBYoTHEoPP,oASSAM AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMRoRoAoAHMED,oMRoMoHOQUE,MRoAoALAM,MRSoRoBEGUMo AdvocateoforotheoRespondento:oPP,oASSAM,oo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA