VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Krishna Chandra Das and 2 Ors v. Guwahati Municipal Corporation and Anr

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
12 November 2024
Bench
Devashis Baruahauthor
Case no.
I.A.(Civil) 3373/2024

Judgment

O R D E R

13.11.2024

Heard Mr. S. Chamaria, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicants and Mr. S. Borah, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Guwahati Municipal Corporation

(GMC).

¶2The applicants herein are the writ petitioners in WP(C) No.2790/2024 which has already been closed as it has become infractuous in view of certain subsequent events.

¶3Be that as it may, it is very pertinent to take note of that pursuant to the notice dated 13.05.2024 which was the subject matter of challenge in WP(C) No.2790/2024, the applicants herein had applied for permission on 07.10.2024 and on the very date, the No Objection Certificate (NOC) for construction had been issued from the Office of the Guwahati Municipal Corporation (GMC). Thereafter on 29.10.2024, the Commissioner, Page No.# 5/7 GMC had issued a notice under Section 337 (1) & 337 (2) of the Guwahati Municipal Corporation Act, 1971 (for short, 'the Act of 1971') on the ground that the applicants failed to submit their NOC and the approved plan for the construction. Pursuant to the said notice, the applicants submitted a reply on 04.11.2024 stating inter-alia that the applicants have been accorded the permission on 07.10.2024, and as such, requested the Commissioner, GMC not to further drop the said proceedings. However, apprehending that action would be initiated under Section 337(3) of the Act of 1971, the instant application was filed seeking certain interim protective measures.

¶4Mr. S. Chamaria, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicants submitted that once there is already a permission on 07.10.2024, the entire proceedings sought to be initiated vide the notice 29.10.2024 is contrary to the provision of Section 337(4) of the Act of 1971. He, therefore, submitted that such proceedings so initiated vide the notice dated 29.10.2024 is on the face of it without jurisdiction and authority and in that regard had referred to a judgment of the learned Division Bench of this Court in the case of T. R. Kapoor vs. Guwahati Municipal Corporation & Another, reported in 1988 (2) GLR 339.

¶5Mr. S. Borah, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent GMC submitted that a notice dated 29.10.2024 was Page No.# 6/7 issued on the ground that the applicants did not submit any NOC and the approved plan pursuant to the notice issued on

13.05.2024. He submitted that even prior to passing any order under Section 337(3) of the Act of 1971, the applicants had approached this Court by filing the instant application. He further submitted that as to whether the reply of the applicants was taken into consideration and what the Commissioner, GMC proposes on the basis of the said reply are things within the jurisdiction of the Commissioner, GMC and as such, the instant proceedings is premature. He further submitted that the proceedings so initiated under Section 337 of the Act of 1971 vide the notice dated 29.10.2024 is a substantive proceedings for which the applicants are required to file a separate proceedings and not by way of a miscellaneous proceedings to a writ proceedings which only pertained to the issuance of a notice dated 13.05.2024 seeking certain documents.

¶6This Court having heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicants is of the opinion that the proceedings so initiated vide the notice dated 29.10.2024 is a separate and a substantive proceedings which cannot be challenged by way of an Interlocutory Application and the same can only be challenged in the manner otherwise provided under law or by way of filing a separate writ petition. Page No.# 7/7

¶7Though the submissions made by the counsels appearing on behalf of the parties have been duly noted herein above, this Court is of the opinion that the applicants herein should be given an opportunity to challenge the said action initiated in terms with the notice dated 29.10.2024 by challenging the same in accordance with law.

¶8This Court has also taken note of the submission of Mr. S. Chamaria, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicants that the interim order which was passed by this Court on 06.11.2024 may be continued for some time so that the applicants can avail the appropriate remedies against the proceedings initiated vide the notice dated 29.10.2024. The said submission, in the opinion of this Court, is reasonable and accordingly, this Court directs that the order dated 06.11.2024 passed in I.A.(C) No.3370/2024 shall continue till 25.11.2024. The applicants, in the meantime, can take appropriate steps against the said notice.

¶9In view of the above, the instant I.A. stands disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

PageoNo.#o1/7 GAHC010231712024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oI.A.(Civil)/3373/2024o KRISHNAoCHANDRAoDASoANDo2oORSo SONoOFoLATEoMALIoRAMoDAS,o SATIoJAYMATIoROAD,oHOUSEoNO.o5,o OPPOSITEoGOL-oBUILDING,oATHGAON,o GUWAHATI,oPIN-o781001,oDISTRICT-oKAMRUP(M),o 2:oRAMoCHANDRAoDAS oSONoOFoLATEoMALIoRAMoDAS o SATIoJAYMATIoROAD oHOUSEoNO.o5 o OPPOSITEoGOL-oBUILDING oATHGAON o GUWAHATI oPIN-o781001 oDISTRICT-oKAMRUP(M) o 3:oGOPALoCHANDRAoDAS oSONoOFoLATEoMALIoRAMoDAS o SATIoJAYMATIoROAD oHOUSEoNO.o5 o OPPOSITEoGOL-oBUILDING oATHGAON o GUWAHATI oPIN-o781001 oDISTRICT-oKAMRUP(M) Page No.# 2/7 ASSAM VERSUS GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANR REPRESENTED HEREIN BY ITS COMMISSIONER, ADDRESS- OFFICE OF GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, GANESH MANDIR, GANESHGURI, GUWAHATI, PIN- 781006, KAMRUP(M), ASSAM. 2:ASSISTANT TOWN PLANNER GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OFFICE OF THE GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION PLANNING BRANCH GANESH MANDIR GANESHGURI GUWAHATI PIN- 781006 KAMRUP(M) ASSAM Linked Case : WP(C)/2790/2024 KRISHNA CHANDRA DAS AND 2 ORS SON OF LATE MALI RAM DAS SATI JAYMATI ROAD HOUSE NO. 5 OPPOSITE GOL- BUILDING ATHGAON GUWAHATI PIN- 781001 DISTRICT- KAMRUP(M) 2: RAM CHANDRA DAS SON OF LATE MALI RAM DAS SATI JAYMATI ROAD HOUSE NO. 5 PageoNo.#o3/7 OPPOSITEoGOL-oBUILDING oATHGAON o GUWAHATI oPIN-o781001 oDISTRICT-oKAMRUP(M) o o3:oGOPALoCHANDRAoDAS SONoOFoLATEoMALIoRAMoDAS o SATIoJAYMATIoROAD oHOUSEoNO.o5 o OPPOSITEoGOL-oBUILDING oATHGAON o GUWAHATI oPIN-o781001 oDISTRICT-oKAMRUP(M) o oVERSUS GUWAHATIoMUNICIPALoCORPORATIONoANDoANR REPRESENTEDoHEREINoBYoITSoCOMMISSIONER o ADDRESS-oOFFICEoOFoGUWAHATIoMUNICIPALoCORPORATION o GANESHoMANDIR oGANESHGURI o GUWAHATI oPIN-o781006 oKAMRUP(M) o 2:ASSISTANToTOWNoPLANNER oGUWAHATIoMUNICIPALoCORPORATION OFFICEoOFoTHEoGUWAHATIoMUNICIPALoCORPORATION o PLANNINGoBRANCH oGANESHoMANDIR o GANESHGURI oGUWAHATI Page No.# 4/7 PIN- 781006 KAMRUP(M) For the applicant (s) : Mr. S. Chamaria, Advocate For the respondent (s) : Mr. S. Borah, SC, GMC BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.