- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 21 March 2024
- Bench
- Devashis Baruah
- Case no.
- I.A.(Civil) 693/2017
Judgment
O R D E R
22.03.2024 None has appeared on behalf of the applicant on call.
¶2The record further reveals that on 18.02.2020, it was duly informed to this Court by the counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant that the respondent Nos.6, 7 & 10 had reportedly expired for which there was a necessity of filing an application for substitution of the legal representatives. Page No.# 2/2 The Office Note dated 02.03.2024 reveals that there has been no application filed for substitution of the legal representatives.
¶3Taking into account the above, the instant application stands abated in view of the death of the respondent Nos.6, 7 & 10, more so in view of the fact that the order passed by the learned Executing Court in exercise of the power under Order XXI Rule 97 and 101 of the CPC was an inseverable decree.
¶4In view of the above, the instant I.A. therefore stands abated and closed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010233132017 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/693/2017 ASSAM FINANCIAL CORPORATION VERSUS MD. ABDUL HANNAN LASKAR and 9 ORS For the appellant (s) : None appears For the respondent (s) : None appears BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.