Chana Mia v. The State of Assam

ORDER

22.05.2024 Heard Mr A Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner, Chana Mia. Also heard Mr D Das, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam/respondent.

¶2Case Diary is received.

¶3It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he has received instructions from the petitioner that he has appeared before the IO. However, the learned Additional Public Page No.# 2/2 Prosecutor has submitted that the Case Diary reveals with clarity that the petitioner has not appeared before IO. So, notice under Section 41-A CrPC has been issued against him. The petitioner was on interim bail vide order dated 16.10.2023, subject to the condition that he appears before the IO, within 2 (two) weeks from 16.10.2023. As the petitioner has violated the bail conditions, the interim bail order dated 16.10.2023, stands cancelled.

¶4In terms of the above, the petition is disposed of. Petition under Section 438 CrPC is hereby, rejected.

¶5Send back the Case Diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010233712023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/3542/2023 CHANA MIA S/O LATE SIRAJ MIA R/ VILL- SUKANTA PALLI P.S. TELIAMURA, DIST. KOHIMA (TRIPURA) VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM TO BE REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A AHMED Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND