VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2023 › High Court of Gauhati

Ruhul Amin and 3 Ors v. The State of Assam

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
8 November 2023
Bench
Robin Phukanauthor
Case no.
Bail Appln. 3772/2023

Judgment

ORDER

08.11.2023 Heard Mr. S. Munir, learned counsel for the accused and also heard Mr. B. Sarma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam, appearing for the State respondent.

¶2This application, under section 439 Cr.P.C. is preferred by four accused, namely, Ruhul Amin, Anser Ali, Sahadev Hajong @ Sahdev Hajong and Fulchan Ali, who have been languishing in jail hazot, in connection with Geetanagar P.S. Case No.218/2023, under Section 379 IPC, for grant of bail.

¶3It is to be noted here that the above noted case has been registered on the basis of an FIR lodged by one Sudarshan Das and Mahananda Moran on 24.09.2023. The essence of allegation made in the aforesaid FIR is that on the intervening night of

24.09.2023, at about 3:00 a.m. some unknown miscreants entered into his house by breaking the lock of the gate and stolen away his Yamaha R-15 motorcycle, bearing Registration No.AS-01EX-7023 and also stolen away his neighbour's KTM DUKE 250 motorcycle, bearing Registration No.AS-23X-2952, which was registered in the name of one Haren Moran.

¶4Mr. Munir, learned counsel for the accused, submits that the accused Ruhul Amin and Anser Ali @ Ansar Ali are languishing in jail hazot since 30.09.2023 and accused Sahadev Hajong @ Sahdev Hajong and Fulchan Ali are languishing in jail hazot since

01.10.2023. Mr. Munir further submits that the stolen bikes have already been recovered Page No.# 3/3 and seized by police and in that view of the matter, their further custodial detention may not be required and therefore, Mr. Munir contended to allow this petition.

¶5On the other hand, Mr. B. Sarma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor has produced the case diary before this Court and submits that the stolen bikes have already been recovered and material part of investigation, so far it relates to the accused persons are concerned, has already been completed.

¶6Having heard the submission of learned Advocates for both the sides, I have carefully gone through the petition and the documents placed on record and also perused the case diary with the assistance of Mr. Sarma, learned Additional P.P.

¶7It appears that the accused persons are languishing in jail hazot since 30.09.2023, and 01.10.2023, respectively. Further, it appears that the material part of investigation, so far it relates to the present accused persons are concerned, has already completed and the stolen bikes have also been recovered and seized by police and as such, their further custodial detention may not be required in the interest of investigation and therefore, this Court is inclined to allow this petition.

¶8Accordingly, it is provided that on furnishing a bond of ` 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) each, with one surety of like amount, to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kamrup(M), the accused persons be enlarged on bail.

¶9In terms of above, this bail application stands disposed of. The case diary be returned. Comparing Assistant Sd/- Robin Phukan JUDGE

Case details

Parties and counsel

PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010235082023 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oBailoAppln./3772/2023o RUHULoAMINoANDo3oORSo S/OoMOINALoHOQUEo VILL-oTIAPARAo P.S.oGOALPARAo DIST.oGOALPARA,oASSAM 2:oANSERoALIo@oANSARoALI oS/OoMOINALoHOQUEo VILL-oTIAPARAo P.S.oGOALPARAo DIST.oGOALPARA oASSAM 3:oSAHADEVoHAJONGo@oSAHDEVoHAJONG oS/OoBHARAToHAJONGo R/OoSHALBARI oMARKULAo P.S.oBAGWANo DIST.oGOALPARA oASSAM 4:oFULCHANoALI oS/OoAJIFURoRAHMANo R/OoKARISALA oBATABARIo P.S.oBAGWANo DIST.oGOALPARA oASSAo VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMo REP.oBYoTHEoPP,oASSAM Page No.# 2/3 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S MUNIR Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.