- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 17 May 2023
- Bench
- Robin Phukan
- Case no.
- WP(C) 7498/2018
Judgment
ORDER
17.05.2023 (AM Bujor Barua, J)
Heard Mr. HR Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. L Devi, learned CGC for the respondents in the Union of India as well as the authorities under the NRC, Mr. AI Ali, learned counsel for the authorities under the Election Commission of India, Mr. J Payeng, learned Special Standing Counsel, Foreigners Tribunal for the Home Department, Government of Assam, as well as the Superintendent of Police (B) Barpeta and Mr. PK Medhi, learned Government Advocate for the Deputy Commissioner, Barpeta.
Page No.# 3/5
¶2The petitioner, namely, Kulsum was referred to the Foreigners Tribunal 5th Barpeta Assam for rendering an opinion as to whether she is a person who had entered the State of Assam on or after 25.03.1971 resulting in the registration of Case No.FT(5th)47/16 corresponding to Reference IM(D)T Case No.4945(A) dated 31/7 wherein an opinion dated 10.09.2018 was rendered declaring the petitioner to be a person who had entered the State of Assam from the specified territory on or after 25.03.1971.
¶3Being aggrieved this writ petition is instituted.
¶4In the writ proceeding, petitioner relies upon the voters list of 1966 of village Titapani P.S. Baghbar in the present Barpeta district which contains the name of Hossen Ali, son of Shaheb at Sl.No.233 and that of Kairan Nessa wife of Hossen at Sl.No.234 and both of them are shown to be residing in the same House No.90. Reference is also made to the voters list of 1989 of village Titapani which contains the name of A Kaddus son of Hossen Ali at Sl.No.565 and that of Mayful Nessa, wife of A Kaddus at Sl.No.566. It is claimed that A Kaddus, son of Hossen Ali of the 1989 voters list of village Titapani is the father of the petitioner.
¶5To establish that A Kaddus, son of Hossen Ali of the 1989 voters list is the father of the petitioner, A Kaddus @ Kuddus Ali, son of Hossen Ali@ Hassen Ali @ Hassen had deposed before the Tribunal as DW-2, wherein he takes a specific stand that the writ petitioner/proceedee Kulsum is his daughter. But it is noticed that the DW-2, A Kaddus @ Kuddus Ali has not been cross examined by the Page No.# 4/5 Home Department, Government of Assam.
¶6Accordingly, the matter stands remanded back to the Tribunal to enable the Tribunal to examine the DW-2 A Kaddus @ Kuddus Ali, as regards the veracity of the deposition (evidence-in-chief) on affidavit rendered by him.
¶7The respondents in the Home Department may also make their own verification on the aforesaid aspect and submit a report before the Tribunal, if so advised.
¶8Accordingly, the petitioner shall appear before the Tribunal on 01.07.2023. The petitioner may also produce all relevant material/document to establish her case, if so advised.
¶9The Tribunal upon doing the needful and after examining the evidences and materials shall pass a reasoned order. In the event, the reasoned order is in favour of the petitioner, the same shall prevail over the opinion dated
10.09.2018 of the Foreigners Tribunal 5th Barpeta Assam in Case No.FT(5th)47/16 corresponding to Reference IM(D)T Case No.4945(A) dated 31/7 and if it is against the petitioner, consequential action under the law shall follow.
¶10Till the reasoned order is passed, no coercive action be taken against the petitioner. Page No.# 5/5
¶11Writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms.
¶12Send back the LCR.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/5 GAHC010237992018 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/7498/2018o KULSUMo D/O-oKUDDUSoALIo@oAoKUDDUS,oW/O-oHABEZoUDDIN,oVILL-oTITAPANI,oP.S- KALGACHIA,oDIST-oBARPETA,oASSAM,oPIN-o781319 VERSUSo THEoUNIONoOFoINDIAoANDo7oORSo REP.oBYoTHEoMINoOFoHOMEoAFFAIRS,oNEWoDELHI-o01 2:THEoELECTIONoCOMMISSIONoOFoINDIA oREP.oBYoTHEoCHIEFoELECTIONoCOMMISSIONER oNEWoDELHI-o01 3:THEoSTATEoOFoASSAM oREP.oBYoTHEoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVToOFoASSAM oHOMEoANDoPOLITICALoDEPTT oDISPUR oGHY-o6 4:THEoDEPUTYoCOMMISSIONER oBARPETA oDIST-oBARPETA oASSAM oPIN-o781301 5:THEoSUPERINTENDENToOFoPOLICE(B) oBARPETA oDIST-oBARPETA oASSAM oPIN-o781301 6:THEoELECTORALoREGISTRATIONoOFFICER Page No.# 2/5 41 JANIA LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY CONSTITUENCY DIST- BARPETA ASSAM PIN- 781319 7:THE ELECTION OFFICER BARPETA ASSAM PIN- 781301 8:THE STATE COORDINATOR NRC BHANGAGARH GHY- 0 Advocate for the Petitioner : MD H R AHMED Advocate for the Respondent : ASSTT.S.G.I. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.