VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Ganesh Das v. The State of Assam

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
31 January 2024
Bench
Susmita Phukan Khaundauthor
Case no.
AB 3444/2022

Judgment

ORDER

01.02.2024 Heard Mr P K Kalita, learned counsel for the petitioner/applicant, Sri Ganesh Das.

¶2The petitioner has filed this application under Section 438 CrPC, with prayer for pre-arrest bail, as he is apprehending arrest in connection with Kamalpur PS Case No. 102/2022, under Sections 21(c)/22(c)/17(c)/29 of the NDPS Act.

¶3Heard Mr D P Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam.

¶4It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the Kamalpur PS Case No. 102/2022 was registered after the petitioner had lodged the FIR on 05.07.2022 when his vehicle bearing Registration No. AS-01-PC-1623 was found missing. Thereafter, during investigation, the vehicle was traced out and contraband was found inside the vehicle by the driver, Shankar Bhakat, who had already abandoned the vehicle.

¶5The FIR of Kamalpur PS Case No. 102/2022 was lodged on 09.07.2022, on the basis of Fatasil Ambari GD Entry No. 126/2022 and subsequent Rangia GD Entry No. Page No.# 3/4 256 of 09.07.2022 was registered. .

¶6It is submitted that during investigation when the vehicle was recovered,

i) 21 plastic soap cases containing suspected heroin,

ii) 3 packets containing suspected opium,

iii) 10 plastic packets containing suspected heroin, and

iv) 16 packets of SPS tablet, including 2304 tablets were all recovered from the spare tyre of the vehicle, a truck bearing Registration No. AS-01-PC-1623.

¶7It is submitted by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor that the petitioner has appeared before the IO and his statement has been recorded.

¶8I have considered the submissions at the Bar with circumspection.

¶9The petitioner was granted interim bail vide order dated 04.05.2023. He has appeared before the IO and has cooperated with the investigation. The petitioner has not violated any bail conditions.

¶10Investigation has progressed to a considerable extent.

¶11Statements of witnesses have already been recorded.

¶12I have considered all aspects and in view of my foregoing discussions, the interim order dated 04.05.2023, is hereby made absolute, under the following conditions:-

i) the petitioner is directed to appear before the IO after every 14 (fourteen) days and cooperate with the investigation, Page No.# 4/4

ii) the petitioner is directed not to tamper with the evidence, and,

iii) the petitioner is directed not to leave the jurisdiction of the learned trial Court, without prior written permission, till completion of trial.

¶13Bail Application as well as the Interlocutory Application stand disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010238552022 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/3444/2022 GANESH DAS S/O SUBODH DAS, R/O BANIKPARA, GOVINDA NAGAR, LALGANESH ROAD, P.S.- FATASIL AMBARI, DIST.- KAMRUP (METRO), ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM THROUGH P.P., ASSAM. Advocate for the Petitioner : MR P K KALITA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM Linked Case : I.A.(Crl.)/774/2022 GANESH DAS S/O SUBODH DAS R/O BANIKPARA GOVINDA NAGAR LALGANESH ROAD P.S.- FATASIL AMBARI DIST.- KAMRUP (METRO) ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP Page No.# 2/4 ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR P K KALITA Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM BEFORE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.