- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 20 February 2024
- Bench
- Budi Habung
- Case no.
- I.A.(Civil) 3895/2019
Judgment
ORDER Date : 21.02.2024
Heard Ms. R. D. Mozumdar, learned counsel for the applicant/appellant. Office note dated 19.07.2023 indicates that the notice upon the respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3 have been duly served and signed by them and in respect of the respondent No. 4, the notice was also received personally. However, no one appears for the respondents. In view of the above, the notice upon the respondent Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 is deemed to be completed. The applicant filed this application under Section 173 of the MV Act, 1988, read with Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, praying for condoning the delay of 76 days in filing the connected appeal against the judgment dated
29.03.2019 passed by the learned Member, MACT, Barpeta, Assam, in MAC Case No. 4/2018. The cause of delay in filing the accompanying appeal has been explained in paragraphs 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 & 10. On perusal of the above explanation, the same constituted sufficient Page No.# 3/3 cause for the delay in filing the accompanying appeal and there is no laches and negligence on the part of the applicant/appellant and, as such, the delay of 76 days in filing the accompanying appeal is hereby condoned. In view of the above, this I.A. stands disposed of. Registry shall register the connected appeal and list the same for admission.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010239092019 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oI.A.(Civil)/3895/2019o THEoNATIONALoINSURANCEoCOMPANYoLIMITEDo REGISTEREDoHEADoOFFICEoATo3,oMIDDLETONoSTREET,oCALCUTTA- 700071,oREPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoMANAGER,oGAUHATIoREGIONALoOFFICE,o BHANGAGARH,oGUWAHATI-781005 VERSUSo SMTI.oREEMAoPAULoANDo3oORS.o D/OoGOPALoCHANDRAoPAUL,oR/OoVILLoANDoP.O.-NAHERBARI,oP.S.- GHAGRAPAR,oDIST-NALBARI,oASSAM,oPIN-781349 2:JYOTIRMOYoPAUL oS/OoGOPALoCHANDRAoPAUL oR/OoVILLoANDoP.O.-NAHERBARI oP.S.-GHAGRAPAR oDIST-NALBARI oASSAMoPIN-781349 3:GAOPALoCHANDRAoPAUL oS/OoLATEoMANoMOHANoPAUL oR/OoVILLoANDoP.O.-NAHERBARI oP.S.-GHAGRAPAR oDIST-NALBARIoASSAMoPIN-781349o(OWNER) 4:NAYANoBARMAN oS/OoSRIoRAMESHoBARMAN oR/OoVILL-NAYABASTI oP.O.-SIMLABARI oP.S.-BARBARIoDIST-BAKSAo(BTAD) oASSAMoPIN-781372o(DRIVERo AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMS.oRoDoMOZUMDARo AdvocateoforotheoRespondento:oMRoMoCHOUDHURYo(r-o1otoo4)oo Page No.# 2/3 Linked Case : THE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED VERSUS SMTI. REEMA PAUL AND 3 ORS ------------ Advocate for : Advocate for : appearing for SMTI. REEMA PAUL AND 3 ORS BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.