- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 8 December 2024
- Bench
- Soumitra Saikia
- Case no.
- WP(C) 6068/2024
Judgment
ORDER
09.12.2024
Heard Mr. D. Baruah, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. M.D. Bora, learned counsel for the respondent No.1. This writ petition was filed with the following prayer: "In the premises aforesaid, it is most respectfully prayed that Your Lordships may be pleased to admit this petition, call for the records and issue a Rule calling upon the Respondents to show cause as to why the respondent authority shall not be directed to provide a space for ticket booking counter in respect of Tata Sumo Vehicle or allow to sell ticket to the passenger in the premises of Multi-Level Car Parking at Paltanbazar and after return of the rule and upon such show cause or causes being shown and upon hearing the parties be pleased to make the Rule absolute giving full and complete relief to the petitioner and/or pass such further or other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper." Making this prayer the petitioners filed a representation before the ASTC Authority vide their representation dated 28.03.2024. Since, the representation was not disposed of, the petitioner approached this Court by filing this writ petition. Today when the matter was called up, the learned Standing Counsel for the ASTC has submitted that the representation has been disposed of. The learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the submission made, in fact he placed a copy of the order dated 07.12.2024 passed by the Managing Director of ASTC rejecting their application. Copy of the said order placed before the Court, is kept in the case record. In view of the order dated 07.12.2023 passed by the ASTC Authority nothing further survives to be decided. Page No.# 3/3 Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed in view of the order dated
07.12.2023 passed by the ASTC Authority. This writ petition is accordingly stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010241362024 ooooooo undefined ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/6068/2024o ANWARoHUSSAINoANDoANRo S/OoLATEoAMEERoHUSSAINo RESIDENToOFoSARUMOTORIA,oDISPURo,oDISToKAMRUPoMoASSAM 2:oSRIoUJJALoBHATTACHARJYA oS/OoLATEoATULoBHATTACHARJYA o RESIDENToOFoCHANDMARI oGUWAHATIo03 oDISToKAMRUPoMoASSAo VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoANDo3oORSo REPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoCOMMISSIONERoANDoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVT.o OFoASSAM,oTRANSPORToDEPARTMENT,oDISPURoGUWAHATIo06 2:THEoMANAGINGoDIRECTOR oASTC oPALTANoBAZAR oGUWAHATIo781008 3:THEoDIVISIONALoSUPERINTENDENTo(POB) oASTC oHO oGUWAHATI 4:THEoSELECTIONoSUPERINTENDENT oASTC oMULTIoLEVELoCARoPARKINGoAToPALTANoBAZAR oGUWAHATIotio AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMR.oDoBARUAH,oMR.oPoKoBORDOLOIo Page No.# 2/3 Advocate for the Respondent : SC, A S T C, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.