VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Salim Ahmed Mazid v. The State of Assam and 3 Ors

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
11 January 2024
Bench
Devashis Baruahauthor
Case no.
WP(C) 7609/2022

Judgment

ORDER Date : 12.01.2024

¶1The case of the Petitioner herein is that the Petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the Respondent Authorities in not making payment of the bills of the Petitioner. The case of the Petitioner herein is that the Petitioner is a registered Class-I Civil Contractor and registered with the Assam Public Works Department (Roads) and as such has participated in a tender process for repairs to SPT Br. No.7/1 on Dipila Balikuchi Bezera Road under ASRB for the year 2006-07. Being successful bidder, the Petitioner was issued formal work order and the tender value was quoted as Rs.5,19,461/-.

¶2It is the case of the Petitioner that the Petitioner successfully executed the works and the Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 have jointly certified that the work had been executed as per specification and 100% completed by the Petitioner in all respect. The learned counsel for the Petitioner further submitted that the Petitioner has submitted a bill of an amount of Rs.5,16,646/-. However, out of the total bill amount, the Respondent Authorities has released only an amount of Rs.3,72,323/- and a balance of Rs.1,44,323/- remain unpaid to the Petitioner till date. It is under such circumstances, the Petitioner has approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution.

¶3Mr. D. Nath, the learned Senior Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the Public Works Department submitted that as to whether the Petitioner has completed the work in terms with the work order in question is a subject matter Page No.# 3/3 of verification which needs to be carried out by the Respondent Authorities and it is only on the basis of such verification, the actual entitlement of the Petitioner could be ascertained.

¶4Upon hearing the learned counsels for the parties, this Court is of the opinion that the interest of justice would be met if a direction is given to the Respondent Authorities to verify as to whether the Petitioner has completed the work in accordance with the formal work order and thereupon to ascertain the exact amount to which the Petitioner is entitled to, if any.

¶5It is under such circumstances, this Court therefore disposes of the instant writ petition thereby directing the Respondent Authorities more particularly the Respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 4 to verify the entitlement of the Petitioner on the basis of the tender conditions as well as the formal work order which was issued in favour of the Petitioner and as to whether the Petitioner has completed the work in question and thereupon, after verification if it is found that the Petitioner is entitled to any amount, the same should be paid to the Petitioner in terms with the judgment of the Full Bench of this Court in the case of Tamsher Ali and Others Vs. State of Assam and others reported in 2008 (4) GLT 1. The said verification be completed within a period of 1 (one) month from the date a certified copy of the instant order is served upon the Respondent No.2.

¶6With above observations and directions, the instant writ petition stands disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010242372022 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/7609/2022o SALIMoAHMEDoMAZIDo S/OoLT.oDR.oABDULoMAZID,oR/OoWARDoNO.o2,oMANGALDAI,oDARRANG,o PIN-784125,oASSAM VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoANDo3oORSo REPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoCOMMISSIONERoANDoSPECIALoSECRETARYoTOo THEoGOVT.oOFoASSAM,oPUBLICoWORKSoDEPARTMENTo(ROADS),oDISPUR,o GUWAHATI,oPIN-781006,oASSAM 2:THEoCHIEFoENGINEER oPUBLICoWORKSoDEPARTMENTo(ROADS)oASSAM oCHANDMARI oGUWAHATI oPIN-781003 oASSAM 3:THEoSUPERINTENDINGoENGINEER oPUBLICoWORKoDEPARTMENToMANGADAIoROADSoCIRCLE oMANGALDAI oPIN-784125 oASSAM 4:THEoEXECUTIVEoENGINEER oPUBLICoWORKoDEPARTMENT oMANGALDAIoRURALoROADoDIVISION oDARRANG oMANGALDAI oPIN-784125 oASSAo Page No.# 2/3 For the Petitioner(s) : Ms. Toshisenla, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. D. Nath, Sr. Government Advocate BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.