- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 13 June 2024
- Bench
- Parthivjyoti Saikia
- Case no.
- AB 3657/2023
Judgment
ORDER Date : 14.06.2024 Heard Mr. D.K. Bhattacharyya, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Bankim Sarma, the learned Additional P.P. for the State of Assam. This is an application under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in respect of Fatasil Page No.# 2/2 Ambari P.S. Case No.244/2023 under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 read with Section 66-C of the Information Technology Act, 2000. The present petitioner was having a relationship with the brother of the informant. Simultaneously she was also maintaining a relationship with one Ashish Roy. When the matter came to light, the FIR was lodged. Pursuant to the interim order granted by this Court earlier, the petitioner has appeared before the Investigating Officer and has co-operated with the police investigation. Under the given circumstances, the petitioner does not deserve to be detained in custody. Accordingly, her bail application is allowed. Therefore, the interim order granted on 19.10.2023 is hereby made absolute. The bail application stands disposed of. The CD shall be returned.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010244722023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/3657/2023 SONAM KUMARI D/O SRI SANJAY KUMTI R/O FIRST FLOOR, HOUSE NO. 39, K.R.C. BYELANE, NEAR RAILWAY GATE NO. 7, KUMARPARA RUPNAGAR, GUWAHATI-781009. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S K DEKA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.