- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 3 December 2024
- Bench
- Parthivjyoti Saikia
- Case no.
- Crl.Pet. 1400/2024
Judgment
PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010244902024 ooooooo undefined ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oCrl.Pet./1400/2024o DR.oRAJIBoKUMARoMOHOTTAo S/OoLATEoSONUoRAMoMOHOTTAoR/OVILL-oBISHNUPUR,P.O.oANDoP.S.o MORANHAT,oDISTRICT-CHARAIDEO,oASSAM,oPIN-785670 VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoANDoANRo REP.oBYoTHEoPP,oASSAM 2:SANJAYoTALUKDAR oS/O-oBHADRESWARoTALUKDAR o R/O-oVILLAGEoTITKA o P.O-oPATHSALA oP.S-oPATHSALA oDIST-oBAJALI oASSAM oPIN-78132o AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMR.oMoKALITA,oMR.oNoMoDAS,MR.oAoPHUKAN,MR.oJo HATIMURIAo AdvocateoforotheoRespondento:oPP,oASSAM,oo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Page No.# 2/3 :: BEFORE :: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA O R D E R
04.12.2024
Heard Mr. M. Kalita, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. R.R. Kaushik, the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, Assam.
¶2This is an application under Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023 challenging the order dated 14.11.2024 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bajali, Pathsala passed in N.I. Case No.21/2024.
¶3The petitioner has been facing trial before the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bajali, Pathsala. On 14.11.2024, he filed an application through his lawyer seeking adjournment but the said lawyer did not appear before the court. Apart from that reason, for some other reasons which do not require to be mentioned here, the trial court rejected the prayer of the petitioner and directed issue of warrant of arrest against him.
¶4I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel of both sides.
¶5It appears that the petitioner has not yet appeared before the trial court. On each and every date he used to file applications seeking adjournment. However, for the ends of justice, this Court has decided to provide the petitioner with an opportunity to appear before the trial court.
¶6Therefore, the impugned order dated 14.11.2024 asking issue of warrant of arrest against the present petitioner is set aside. The petitioner is directed to appear before the trial court i.e. learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bajali Pathsala on
11.12.2024. On his appearance, he shall be released on bail of ₹20,000/- with a surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bajali Pathsala. Page No.# 3/3 With the aforesaid direction, the present petition is disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.