VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2023 › High Court of Gauhati

Aslam Tariq Rahman v. The State of Assam and 5 Ors

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
24 February 2023
Bench
Manish Choudhuryauthor
Case no.
WP(C) 7845/2022

Judgment

ORDER Date : 24-02-2023 Heard Mr. N.J. Gogoi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. D.S. Neog, learned Standing Counsel, Irrigation Department for all the respondents.

¶2The petitioner has instituted the writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India stating that he is a registered Class-I[A] Contractor under the Irrigation Department, Dibrugarh, Government of Assam and as such Contractor, he executed a number of works on behalf of the respondent authorities in the Irrigation Department. It is stated that by a work order bearing memo no. DD[I]/Tech/CS-I/14/2020-21/366 dated 24.02.2021, the petitioner was awarded a contract work – "Regularisation of work for survey and documentation work of the scheme Sessa LIS under AIBP [Minor] for the year 2013-14" ['the Contract-Work', for short] at a contract value of Rs. 2,35,400/- [approx.]. On being awarded the Contract-Work, he proceeded to execute the same and completed the same on 25.02.2021. After executing the work, he had submitted the final bill for an amount of Rs. 2,35,400/- on 25.02.2021. When despite repeated approaches for disbursal of the said amount, the respondent authorities has not taken any discernible action for release of the same, the petitioner has stated to have approached by filling his application seeking inter alia a direction to the respondent authorities in the Irrigation Department to disburse the amount of Rs. 2,35,400/- to him. Page No. 3/4

¶3Ms. Neog, learned Standing Counsel, Irrigation Department has submitted, on instruction, that the amount of Rs. 2,35,400/-, as claimed by the petitioner, appears to be an admitted liability but yet, the same is required to examined. It is further submitted by Mr. Neog that the amount could not be disbursed to the petitioner till date due to paucity of fund. It is, thus, submitted by Ms. Neog that the instant case is squarely covered by the Full Bench judgment of this Court, rendered on 29.09.2008 in Writ Appeal No. 484/2005 [Tamsher Ali & Ors. vs. State of Assam & Ors.], reported in 2008 [4] GLT 1 [FB] and similar other 194 writ petitions and, as such, the respondent authorities will process the claim of the petitioner in light of the principles enunciated in the aforesaid judgment.

¶4Mr. Gogoi, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the respondent authorities may be directed to take immediate action for disbursal of the amount of Rs. 2,35,400/- [Rupees Two Lakhs Thirty Five Thousand Four Hundred] immediately, in terms of the principles laid down in Tamsher Ali [supra].

¶5In view of the above submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage itself with a direction to the respondent no. 3 i.e. the Chief Engineer, Irrigation Department, Assam to examine the claim of the writ petitioner within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order and then, the concerned respondent authorities will process the claim of the petitioner as regards disbursal of Rs. 2,35,400/- [Rupees Two Lakhs Thirty Five Thousand Four Hundred] in accordance with law and also in the light of the directions contained in Tamsher Ali [supra].

¶6The petitioner after obtaining a certified copy of this order shall place the same before the respondent no. 3 i.e. the Chief Engineer, Irrigation Department, Assam for doing the needful from his end.

¶7The writ petition stands disposed of in terms of the above directions.

Page No. 4/4

¶8No order as to cost.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

PageoNo.o1/4 GAHC010249192022 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/7845/2022o ASLAMoTARIQoRAHMANo S/OoLATEoDR.oMUHIBURoRAHMAN,oR/OoSOUTHoAMOLAPATTY,oP.O.- MOHANAGHAT,oP.S.-DIBRUGARH,oDIST-DIBRUGARH,oASSAM-786008 VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoANDo5oORSo REPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVERNMENToOFoASSAM,o IRRIGATIONoDEPARTMENT,oASSAMoSECRETARIAT,oDISPUR,oGUWAHATI-6 2:COMMISSIONERoANDoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVERNMENToOFoASSAM oFINANCEoDEPARTMENT oASSAMoSECRETARIAT oDISPUR oGUWAHATI-6 3:CHIEFoENGINEER oIRRIGATIONoDEPARTMENT oGOVERNMENToOFoASSAM oCHANDMARI oGUWAHATI-3 oASSAM 4:SUPERINTENDINGoENGINEER oIRRIGATIONoDEPARTMENT oDIBRUGARHoCIRCLE oIRRIGATIONoDIVISION oDIBRUGARH oASSAM oPIN-786001 5:EXECUTIVEoENGINEER oDIBRUGARHoDIVISIONo(IRRIGATION) oDIBRUGARH Page No. 2/4 ASSAM PIN-786001 6:ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER DIBRUGARH DIVISION (IRRIGATION) DIBRUGARH ASSAM PIN-78600 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N J GOGOI Advocate for the Respondent : SC, IRRIGATION BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.