- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 30 May 2024
- Bench
- S. Justice Marli Vankung
- Case no.
- I.A.(Civil) 3529/2023
Judgment
ORDER Date : 31.05.2024 Heard Mr. T. Kalita, learned counsel for the applicant/ appellant along with Ms. J. Aktar, learned counsel appearing for the respondent nos. 1 & 4. None has appeared for the respondent nos. 2 & 3. However, it is seen that the Lawazima Court in its order dated
20.02.2024 has observed that service of notice upon respondent Nos. 2 & 3 is deemed to be complete. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the instant I.A.(Civil) has been filed with regard to the condonation of delay of 34 days in preferring the appeal against the judgment and order dated 23.05.2023 passed by the learned Member, MACT, Bongaigaon in MAC Case No. 130/2019. The learned counsel, further, submits that the instant appeal is with regard to the quantum of the award and that the claimant being duly represented the presence of respondent Nos. 2 & 3 may not be required in the instant case. Page No.# 3/3 The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the reasons for delay of 34 days in filing the appeal has been explained in paragraphs 4,5,6 & 7 of the application wherein the main ground for the delay is the time taken in procuring the necessary document in filing the appeal against the impugned judgment and order dated 23.05.2023. The learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1 & 4 has submitted that they have no objection if the delay is condoned. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for both the parties and on perusal of paragraphs 4,5,6 & 7 of the application, this Court finds that the delay of 34 days has been satisfactorily explained in the abovementioned paragraphs and there is no laches and negligence on the part of the applicant. In view of above, the delay in filing the appeal is condoned and the I.A.(Civil) is disposed of. Office to register the appeal and be listed for admission. Registry is to reflect the name of Mr. M. Khan, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1 & 4 in the cause list. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010249952023 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oI.A.(Civil)/3529/2023o NATIONALoINSURANCEoCOMPANYoLIMITEDo HAVINGoITSoREGISTEREDoOFFICEoANDoHEADoOFFICEoATo3,oMIDDLETONo STREET,oKOLKATAoANDoITSoREGIONALoOFFICEoAToBHANGAGARH,oG.S.o ROAD,oGUWAHATI-o781005oREPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoCHIEFoREGIONALo MANAGER,oGUWAHATIoREGIONALoOFFICE. VERSUSo PANKAJoJYOTIoBARMANoANDo3oORS.o S/OoHARoKUMARoBARMAN,o VILL.-oCHAPRAKATAoPT-oII,o P.S.-oBONGAIGAON,oDIST.-oBONGAIGAON,oASSAM,oPIN-o783380. 2:SAIFULoHOQUE oS/OoANTALoHOQUE o VILL.-oBORTOLOWA oP.O.-oDHALIGAON oP.S.-oDHALIGAON oDIST.-oCHIRANG oBTAD oASSAM oPIN-o783385. 3:MOTLEBoALI oS/OoANTALoHOQUE o VILL.-oBORTOLOWA oP.O.-oDHALIGAON oP.S.-oDHALIGAON oDIST.-oCHIRANG oBTAD Page No.# 2/3 ASSAM PIN- 783385. 4:HAR KUMAR BARMAN S/O LATE MANYU RAM BARMAN VILL.- CHAPRAKATA PT- II P.S.- BONGAIGAON P.O.- CHAPRAKATA DIST.- BONGAIGAON ASSAM PIN- 783380 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR T KALITA Advocate for the Respondent : MR. M KHAN (R-1,4) BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MARLI VANKUNG
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.