VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Biplab Kumar Sarkar v. The State of Assam

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
20 February 2024
Bench
Robin Phukanauthor
Case no.
AB 3759/2023

Judgment

ORDER Date : 21.02.2024

Heard Ms. J. Ghosh, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Ms. A. Begum, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State respondent.

¶2Apprehending arrest in connection with Gobardhana P.S. Case No. 162/2023, under Sections 341/294/353/427 of the IPC, this application under Page No.# 2/3 Section 438 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the applicant, namely, Biplab Kumar Sarkar, for grant of pre-arrest bail.

¶3It is to be noted here that the aforementioned case has been registered on the basis of an FIR lodged by UBC Nayan Jyoti Gogoi on 22.10.2023. The essence of allegation made in the FIR dated 22.10.2023, is that on that day, while the informant along with Constable Deepjyoti Dutta, were attending duty at Hatapara Durga Puja Mandap, one Biplab Sarkar, who was heavily drunk, started misbehaving with them, at about 8:30 p.m., and he also engaged in an argument with the Secretary of the Puja Mandap, namely, Gautam Sarkar, and while they were engaging in argument, then the informant tried to pacify him and then, Biplab Sarkar obstructed him in discharging his duties and pushed him away and started beating him and snatched away his whistle and his hand-watch etc.

¶4Ms. Ghosh, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant had been granted the privilege of interim pre-arrest bail, vide order dated

14.11.2023 and pursuant to the said order, he has also appeared before the I.O. on 21.12.2023 and he has been cooperating with the investigating agency, and a contention is being made that the interim order dated 14.11.2023, may be made absolute in the same terms and conditions.

¶5On the other hand, Ms. Begum, the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor submits that she has not received the case diary and as per her instruction, the I.O. has laid charge-sheet, being charge-sheet No. 147/2023 dated 29.11.2023.

¶6In view of the above, this Court is inclined to dispose of this application by directing the applicant to appear before the learned Court below on or before

12.03.2024, and to apply for regular bail and in the event of filing such an application, the learned Court below shall consider the same in accordance with Page No.# 3/3 law.

¶7Till then, interim order dated 14.11.2023 shall stand extended. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010251642023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/3759/2023 BIPLAB KUMAR SARKAR S/O BRAJEN KUMAR SARKAR, R/O VILL- HATAPARA, P.S. SIMLAGURI, DIST. DHUBRI, ASSAM PIN-781315, OCCUPATION- BUSINESS. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S C BISWAS Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.