- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 25 August 2023
- Bench
- Achintya Malla Bujor Barua, S. Justice Mitali Thakuria
- Case no.
- WP(C) 8259/2022
Judgment
ORDER
25.08.2023 (A.M. Bujor Barua, J)
Heard Mr. N. Borah, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. L. Devi, learned Central Government Counsel as well as Standing Counsel, NRC, for the respondent Nos. 1 & 4; Mr. G. Sarma, learned Standing Counsel, Foreigners Tribunal, for respondent Nos. 2 & 6; Mr. T. Pegu, learned Standing Counsel, Election Commission of India, for respondent No. 3. Mr. P. Sharma, learned Government Advocate, Assam, for respondent No. 5.
¶2The petitioner, namely, Zahed Ali, claims that a notice was issued by the Foreigners' Tribunal No. 1, Tezpur, Sonitpur, in F.T. Case No. 3183/2012, in the name of Zabed Ali, son of late Rahimuddin of village Tupukijhar in the Sonitpur District. But a claim is made that the notice was served upon Zahed Ali, son of Rahimuddin of village Tupukijhar in the Sonitpur District. Zahed Ali accordingly appeared before the Tribunal and brought into its notice that the notice was Page No.# 3/4 issued in a wrong name, but the Tribunal ignored the same and proceeded against Zahed Ali although the notice was issued against Zabed Ali. Being aggrieved, this writ petition is instituted.
¶3The respondents claimed that the name of Zabed Ali appeared in the notice of the Tribunal because when the proceede was verified by the police, he had wrongly stated his name to be Zabed Ali even if may be Zahed Ali and therefore, the respondents are unwilling to change the name in the notice.
¶4On the other hand, the petitioner claims prejudice inasmuch as he can prove his case only as Zahed Ali and not as Zabed ali.
¶5Without going further into the rival contentions raised and as it would be indeterminable as to whether the petitioner is Zahed Ali or Zabed Ali or whether the notice was rightly issued or wrongly issued, we are of the view that the complete interest of justice of both the parties would be met if the petitioner, who is before the Court in this writ petition, whosoever he is whether he is Zahed Ali or Zabed Ali, to appear before the Tribunal on the date fixed. Upon appearing before the Tribunal, the petitioner will declare as to what is his name, his father's name and complete address and if the authorities intend to proceed against the present petitioner, the Tribunal to issue a fresh notice to the petitioner in the correct form of the name what he states before the Tribunal and the petitioner as would be personally appearing before the Tribunal would accept the notice in the Tribunal itself and that will make the service of notice to be complete. Thereafter the petitioner will discharge the burden under Section 9 before the Tribunal to prove that he is not a foreigner.
¶6The earlier opinion dated 30.01.2020, in Case No. FT Case No. 3183/2012, which is assailed in this writ petition, is accordingly set aside and whatever Page No.# 4/4 opinion the Tribunal may render upon the petitioner, appearing in the manner indicated above, shall be binding on the petitioner.
¶7The petitioner to positively appear before the Tribunal on 22.09.2023 for doing the needful as indicated above and the Tribunal shall also do the needful as may be required in the manner indicated above.
¶8The declaration of the name by the petitioner upon appearing before the Tribunal shall be in a written form.
¶9The writ petition stands allowed as indicated above. Send back the LCR.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/4 GAHC010253882022 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/8259/2022o ZAHEDoALIo S/O-oLATEoRAHIMUDDIN,o R/O-oVILLAGEoTUBUKIJHAR,o P.O-,GHORAMARA,o P.S-oTEZPUR,oPIN-784001,oDIST-oSONITPUR,oASSAM VERSUSo THEoUNIONoOFoINDIAoANDo5oORS.o REP.oBYoTHEoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVT.oOFoINDIA,oMINISTRYoOFoHOMEo AFFAIRS,oSASTRIoBHAWAN,oNEWoDELHI-o110001. 2:THEoSTATEoOFoASSAM oREP.oBYoTHEoCOMMISSIONERoANDoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVT.oOFoASSAM oHOMEoDEPARTMENT oDISPUR oGUWAHATI-6 3:THEoELECTIONoCOMMISSIONoOFoINDIA oNEWoDELHI-110001 4:THEoSTATEoCOORDINATOR oNATIONALoREGISTERoOFoCITIZENS oASSAM oBHANGAGARH oGUWAHATI-05 oDIST-oKAMRUPo(M) 5:THEoDEPUTYoCOMMISSIONER oDIST-oSONITPUR oTEZPUR oASSAM Page No.# 2/4 PIN-784001 6:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (B) DIST- SONITPUR TEZPUR PIN-784001 ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N BORAH Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.