VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Azibur Rahman v. The State of Assam and 4 Ors

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
30 July 2024
Bench
N. Unni Krishnan Nairauthor
Case no.
WP(C) 8007/2018

Judgment

ORDER Date : 31.07.2024

Heard Mr. M. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. S. K.Talukdar, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Co-operation Department representing the respondents no. 1 to 4. None has entered appearance on behalf of the respondent no. 5.

¶2The challenge made in the present proceeding is to an order dated

09.11.2018, issued by the Registrar, Co-operative Societies, debarring the petitioner herein from functioning as the Secretary of the Batadraba Satra Samabai Samitee Ltd. The petitioner has also presented a challenge to an order dated 12.11.2018, whereby directions were issued by the Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Nagaon, in pursuance to the said order dated 09.11.2018, to take immediate steps for making alternative arrangements for holding the post of Secretary of the Co-operative Societies upon debarment of the petitioner from functioning in the said capacity.

¶3The petitioner contends that he was appointed as the Secretary of the Batadraba Satra Samabai Samitee Ltd., (hereinafter referred to as Page No.# 3/5 'the society') by the Board of the said Society on 07.06.2013 and he was so functioning in the said capacity. Subsequently, certain allegations came to be leveled against the petitioner, for which, criminal proceeding came to be so instituted against him and the petitioner had approached this Court, seeking bail. Accordingly, this Court had enlarged the petitioner on bail.

¶4The respondent authorities, more particularly, the Registrar of the Co-operative Societies, Assam vide an order dated 09.11.2018, noticing the criminal case as instituted against the petitioner and nature of allegation as leveled against the petitioner, proceeded to exercise his power under Section 29 (4) of the Assam Co-operative Societies Act, 2004 and the petitioner herein was debarred from discharging his duties as Secretary of the said Society.

¶5The said order was followed by an communication dated

12.11.2018, by which, the Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Nagaon had required the Society to make alternative arrangements for holding the post of Secretary of the said Society on account of the debarment of the petitioner herein.

¶6The said writ petition, on being instituted and moved before this Court, this Court vide order dated 20.11.2018, while being pleased to issue notice in the matter, upon consideration of the issues arising in the matter was pleased to issue an interim direction to the effect that the Page No.# 4/5 impugned order dated 09.11.2018 and the consequential step taken thereon, vide the communication dated 12.11.2018 to remain stayed.

¶7It is seen thereafter, neither the Society nor the Co-operation Department had moved before this Court, praying for vacation of the said order nor affidavit has been filed in this matter by the respondents herein.

¶8In view of the above position, without going into the issue as to whether the order dated 09.11.2018 was so passed in proper exercise of jurisdiction by the authority so issuing it, the said orders, in view of the lapse of time occasioning in the matter and there being no further allegation brought on record against the petitioner, after the passing of the interim directions, the order dated 09.11.2018 as well as the communication dated 12.11.2018 stands set aside.

¶9Having interfered with the order dated 09.11.2018 and 12.11.2018; it is provided that the Board of Directors of the Society, on consideration of the matter, including the allegations leading to the passing of the order dated 09.11.2018; if any misconduct is so evident against the petitioner, the Board of Directors of the Society would be at liberty to proceed against the petitioner in a manner known to law.

¶10In the event of institution of any such proceeding against the Page No.# 5/5 petitioner, the petitioner herein shall be given full liberty to place his defence in the matter.

¶11With the above observations and directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

PageoNo.#o1/5 GAHC010257322018 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/8007/2018o AZIBURoRAHMANo S/O-oMD.oMASTUFAoHUSSAIN,oR/O-oVILL-oRAMPURoSATRA,oNAGAON,o ASSAM VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoANDo4oORSo REP.oBYoTHEoCOMMISSIONERoANDoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVToOFoASSAM,o COoOPERATIONoDEPTT,oDISPUR,oGUWAHATI-o6 2:THEoREGISTRAR oCOOPERATIVEoSOCIETIES oGOVToOFoASSAM oKHANAPARA oGUWAHATI-o22 3:THEoZONALoJOINToREGISTRARoOFoCOOPERATIVEoSOCIETIES oGUWAHATIoZONE oKAMRUP oASSAM 4:THEoASSISTANToREGISTRAR oOFoCOOPERATIVEoSOCIETIES oNAGAON oASSAM 5:ANUPAMoHAZARIKA oSENIORoINSPECTOR/oAUDITORoOFoCOOPERATIVEoSOCIETIES oNAGAONoCUMoCHAIRMAN oBATADRAVAoSAMABAIoSAMITTEEoLIMITEo AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMRoNoDUTTA,oMR.oBoTALUKDAR,MR.oMoDAS,MS.oJo Page No.# 2/5 HAZARIKA Advocate for the Respondent : SC, CO OP, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.