VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Mai Juddin Sk v. The State of Assam

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
3 December 2024
Bench
Parthivjyoti Saikiaauthor
Case no.
AB 3171/2024

Judgment

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010257362024

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/3171/2024 MAI JUDDIN SK. S/O ANSER ALI R/O VILL-KORAITOLA, P.O. FAKIRAGRAM, P.S. FAKIRAGRAM, DIST. KOKRAJHAR, ASSAM, PIN-783345, MOBILE NO. 7002796815 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A LAL, MR A BRAHMA,M K DEB Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,

:: BEFORE :: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA O R D E R

04.12.2024

Heard Mr. A. Lal, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. R.R. Kaushik, the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, Assam.

¶2This is an application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 praying for pre-arrest bail in respect of Fakiragram P.S. Case No.70/2024 (corresponding to G.R. No.481/2024), registered under Sections 318(4)/ 351(2)/ 64/ 308(2)/69 of the BNS, 2023. Page No.# 2/2

¶3A 35 year old married woman has alleged that the present petitioner, who is also married, had developed relationship with her. During that period, they had physical relationship on some occasions. She was taken to hotels where they spent nights there together. In some other occasions, she even stayed in his house for a period of one and half months. The woman has alleged that the petitioner has asked her to divorce her husband so that he can marry her. She did not do so. Even then, she kept putting pressure upon the petitioner to marry her. This time, the petitioner allegedly refused to marry her and asked her to take the help of law.

¶4Therefore, the informant has lodged the FIR before police.

¶5I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel of both sides.

¶6A plain reading of the FIR is sufficient to show that no criminal case has been made out against the present petitioner. Therefore, he does not deserve to be detained in custody. His pre-arrest bail application is allowed.

¶7It is hereby directed that in the event of arrest in connection with Fakiragram P.S. Case No.70/2024 (corresponding to G.R. No.481/2024), registered under Sections 318(4)/ 351(2)/ 64/ 308(2)/69 of the BNS, 2023, the petitioner namely, Mai Uddin Sk shall be released on bail of ₹20,000/- with a surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority.

¶8The petitioner is directed to co-operate with Police Investigating Officer as and when required. With the aforesaid direction, the present application is disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.