- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 26 March 2024
- Bench
- Parthivjyoti Saikia
- Case no.
- Bail Appln. 4182/2023
Judgment
ORDER Date : 27.03.2024 Heard Mr. S.Borthakur, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner. Also heard Mr. R.J. Baruah, the learned Additional P.P. for the State of Assam. This is an application under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. in respect of G.R. Case No. 5053/2023 arising out of Noonmati P.S. Case No. 215/2023 under Sections 341/354/323/352/511 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged in the FIR that when the 17 year old of the informant was going to attend her computer class, she was stopped on the road by the present petitioner and he molested her. It is further alleged that the petitioner had hit her forehead with his mobile phone and also slapped her. It is alleged that the petitioner tried to snatch her mobile phone and tried to run away with it. In her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., the victim girl had stated that for a period of 2 years she was in love with the petitioner and he even had physical relationship with her during that period. The girl has stated that she believed the petitioner to be a Muslim but later on she discovered that he was a Hindu and a married person having two children. On 11.7.2023 while the girl was going to attend her computer class, the petitioner allegedly snatched her mobile phone and ran away. The petitioner chased her into her room where the petitioner had physically assaulted the girl. She stated that her mobile phone was returned to her subsequently she informed her parents about the aforesaid incident. Mr. Baruah submits that the victim girl is yet to be examined by the trial Page No.# 3/3 court and therefore she objected to the bail prayer of the petitioner. Mr. Borthakur submits that the girl eloped with someone in the meantime. He submits that the accused had already spent 257 days in judicial custody till now. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for both sides. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner is no longer deserves to be detained in custody. Therefore, his bail application is allowed. Accordingly, it is hereby directed that the petitioner Amit Rabi Das shall be released on bail of Rs.25,000/- with a surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, Kamrup(Metro), Guwahati, Assam. The bail application stands disposed off.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010257782023 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oBailoAppln./4182/2023o AMIToRABIoDASo S/OoLT.oMOTICHANDoRABIoDASo R/OoCHOTONICHINPUR,oMEDORTORIo P.S.oFAKIRGANJo DIST.oDHUBRI,oASSAM VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoANDoANRo REP.oHEREINoBYoTHEoPP,oASSAM 2:HALIMANoNESA oW/OoMD.oNISANoALIo R/OoNO.o1oMATHGHARIA oNEARoBOROoCHOWKo P.S.oNOONMATI o DIST.oKAMRUPo(M) oASSAo AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMRoSoBORTHAKURo AdvocateoforotheoRespondento:oPP,oASSAMoo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooo Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.