VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Amarjyoti Kalita v. The State of Assam

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
15 December 2024
Bench
Manash Ranjan Pathakauthor
Case no.
Bail Appln. 3731/2024

Judgment

ORDER

16.12.2024 Heard Mr. D Gagai, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. K K Parashar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam, for the State. 2) By this application filed under Section 483 BNSS, 2023, the petitioner, namely, Sri Amarjyoti Kalita, son of Sri Keshav Kalita, resident of Madhb Kalita, Khanapara, Police Station-Dispur, District-Kamrup (M), is praying for his bail in Garchuk Police Station Case No. 351/2024, registered under Sections 303(2)/317(2) BNS, 2023 read with Section 7 of the Assam Cattle Preservation Act, 2021 and read with Section 11 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animal Act, 1960, corresponding to G.R. No. 6558/2024, wherein, he was arrested on 05.11.2024 and is in custody since then. 3) As per the FIR dated 05.11.2024 lodged by the complainant, the case is that on the night of

05.11.2024 at around 3:30 AM during naka checking at NH-27, a Tata truck bearing registration No. AS-26-AC-1949 was found coming from Jalukbari side towards Khanapara, escorted by one Maruti Suzuki vehicle bearing registration No. AS-23-K-0755, who avoided police signal and tried to fled away from the scene. But somehow, police personnel managed to apprehend both the vehicles. 4) The said truck was driven by one Afsar Ali and the helper of the Truck was one Abdul Kuddush and in the said truck, 30 (thirty) Nos. of cattle were found, out of which, 14 (fourteen) Nos. of cattle were already dead. On being enquired, the driver as well as the helper of the said truck failed to produce any documents relating to the ownership of the cattle, held in their truck. 5) From the said Maruti Suzuki vehicle, two occupants, namely Amarjyoti Kalita, who was the driver of the said vehicle and one Fazlur Rahman were apprehended and they also failed to place any relevant documents relating to the ownership of the cattle. Accordingly, all the accused persons were apprehended and the cattle were seized by the police. 6) On the basis of the said FIR of the complainant, Garchuk Police Station Case No. 351/2024 under Sections 303(2)/317(2) BNS, 2023 read with Section 7 of the Assam Cattle Preservation Page No.# 3/4 Act, 2021 and read with Section 11 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animal Act, 1960, corresponding to G.R. No. 6558/2024, was registered. 7) During investigation, two other accused persons, namely, Md. Maichan Khan and Nazir Hussain were arrested and during investigation, it was found that they used to work as agents of another accused person of the case, namely, Mustafijur Rahman, who used to illegally transport cattle by using the said Tata truck bearing registration No. AS-26-AC-1949. 8) As both the vehicles, i.e., the Tata truck as well as the Maurti Suzuki vehicle, along with the 16 (sixteen) Nos. of live cattle have already been seized by the police, considering the detention of the petitioner in custody, since 05.11.2024, the Court is of the view that further custodial detention of the petitioner in said Garchuk P.S. Case No. 351/2024 is not warranted for investigation of the said case. As such, this bail application of the petitioner in said Garchuk P.S. Case No. 351/2024 is hereby accepted. 9) Accordingly, the petitioner, namely, Sri Amarjyoti Kalita, son of Sri Keshav Kalita, be released on bail in said Garchuk P.S. Case No. 351/2024 on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 45,000/- with 2(two) local sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kamrup (M), Guwahati, subject to the conditions that the petitioner, named above —

i) shall appear before the concerned Investigating Officer of said Garchuk P.S. Case No. 351/2024, as and when he is required for in the said case;

ii) shall not leave the territorial jurisdiction of said Garchuk Police Station, without obtaining prior written permission from the concerned Investigating Officer of the said case;

iii) shall not hamper with the investigation, or tamper with the evidence of the case;

iv) shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case, so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer and;

v) shall not involve himself in any criminal activities in the future. 10) Any violation of the aforesaid terms and conditions by the petitioner, namely, Sri Amarjyoti Kalita, son of Sri Keshav Kalita, the bail granted to him in said Garchuk P.S. Case No. 351/2024 shall stand automatically vacated. Page No.# 4/4 11) This bail application accordingly stands disposed of. 12) Return the Case Diary herewith.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

PageoNo.#o1/4 GAHC010259842024 ooooooo 2024:GAU-AS:12759 ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oBailoAppln./o3731/2024o AMARJYOTIoKALITA S/OoSRIoKESHAVoKALITAo R/OoMADHABoKALITA oKHANAPARA o P.S.oDISPUR o DIST.oKAMRUPo(M) oASSAM oVERSUS THEoSTATEoOFoASSAM REPoBYoTHEoPP oASSAM o------------ oAdvocateoforo:oMR.oDoGAGAI Advocateoforo:oPP oASSAMoappearingoforoTHEoSTATEoOFoASSAM ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Page No.# 2/4 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.