- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 29 November 2023
- Bench
- Kalyan Rai Surana
- Case no.
- I.A.(Civil) 3416/2023
Judgment
ORDER Date : 29-11-2023
29.11.2023.
Heard Mr. D. Mazumdar, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. G.R. Dutta, learned counsel for the applicant.
¶2This interlocutory application has been filed for review of the order dated
25.09.2023 passed in CRP No.150/2023.
¶3The learned Senior counsel for the petitioner has submitted that this Court having recorded his submission to the effect that application under order IX Rule 13 CPC was without jurisdiction and consequently the order dated
24.07.2023, which was impugned in CRP No. 150/2023 was also without jurisdiction, this Court had granted liberty to the applicant to withdraw the said CRP No. 150/2023 with liberty to approach the Court again. However, while Page No.# 4/5 prayer made by the learned counsel for the applicant is recorded in para 10 of the order, while granting liberty, this Court granted liberty to the petitioner to approach the Court of learned Civil Judge No. 1, Cachar, Silchar.
¶4Accordingly it appears that the liberty granted to the applicant to approach the Court of learned Civil Judge No. 1 Cachar, Silchar is inadvertent typographical error which crept in the order dated 25.09.2023, passed in CRP No. 150/2023.
¶5Paragraph 10 of the said order dated 25.09.2023 in CRP No. 150/2023 read as follows: "Apparently, it appears that an application under Order IX Rule 13 read with Section 151 CPC is not the appropriate remedy to set aside the appellate order passed in exercise of jurisdiction under Order XLIII Rule 1(r) CPC even if such order was ex parte. Therefore, the Court is inclined to allow the prayer made by the learned senior counsel for the petitioner and this present revision stands closed on withdrawal with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Court of learned Civil Judge No.1, Cachar, Silchar in an appropriate jurisdiction, if the petitioner, who is the substituted legal representatives of the original defendant no.1 is aggrieved by the order dated 09.12.2016 passed in the proceedings of Misc. Appeal No. 7/2016. Further liberty is granted to the petitioner to assail the two orders dated 24.07.2023 passed by the learned Civil Judge No.1, Cachar, Silchar in Misc. Case No. 73/2017 and Misc. Case No.74/2017, in an appropriate manner, if so advised".
¶6The corrected paragraph 10 of the said order shall now be read as follows: " Apparently, it appears that an application under Order IX Rule 13 read with Section 151 CPC is not the appropriate remedy to set aside the appellate order passed in exercise of jurisdiction under Order XLIII Rule 1(r) CPC even if such order was ex parte. Therefore, the Court is inclined to allow the prayer made by the learned senior counsel for the petitioner and this present revision stands closed on withdrawal with liberty to the petitioner to approach this Page No.# 5/5 Court in an appropriate jurisdiction, if the petitioner, who is the substituted legal representatives of the original defendant no.1 is aggrieved by the order dated
09.12.2016 passed in the proceedings of Misc. Appeal No. 7/2016. Further liberty is granted to the petitioner to assail the two orders dated 24.07.2023 passed by the learned Civil Judge No.1, Cachar, Silchar in Misc. Case No. 73/2017 and Misc. Case No.74/2017, in an appropriate manner, if so advised".
¶7Accordingly, this review application stands allowed to the extent as indicated above.
¶8This order shall now be read together with the order dated 25.09.2023 passed in CRP No. 150/2023.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/5 GAHC010260542023 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oI.A.(Civil)/3416/2023o SMTI.oIBEMHALoSINGHAo W/OoLATEoKUNJAMONIoSINGHA,oC/OoAKRAMoALI,oVILLoANDoP.O.- BANSKANDI,oP.S.-LAKHIPUR,oDIST-CACHAR,oASSAM VERSUSo IRABAToSINGHAoANDo12oORS.o S/OoLATEoIBOTONoSINGHA,oR/OoVILLoANDoP.O.-BANSKANDI,oP.S.- LAKHIPUR,oDIST-CACHAR,oASSAM 2:BHAGIRATHAoSINGHA oS/OoLATEoIBOTONoSINGHA oR/OoVILLoANDoP.O.-BANSKANDI oP.S.-LAKHIPUR oDIST-CACHAR oASSAM 3:SURENDRAoKUMARoSINGHA oS/OoLATEoIBOTONoSINGHA oR/OoVILLoANDoP.O.-BANSKANDI oP.S.-LAKHIPUR oDIST-CACHAR oASSAM 4:NARENDRAoSINGHA oS/OoLATEoIBOTONoSINGHA oR/OoVILLoANDoP.O.-BANSKANDI oP.S.-LAKHIPUR oDIST-CACHAR oASSAM 5:SMTIoNIRUPAoSINGHA PageoNo.#o2/5 oD/OoLATEoIBOTONoSINGHA oR/OoVILLoANDoP.O.-BANSKANDI oP.S.-LAKHIPUR oDIST-CACHAR oASSAM 6:SMTIoNIRALAoSINGHA oD/OoLATEoIBOTONoSINGHA oR/OoVILLoANDoP.O.-BANSKANDI oP.S.-LAKHIPUR oDIST-CACHAR oASSAM 7:SMTIoPREMODAoSINGHA oD/OoLATEoBRAJENDRAoSINGHA oR/OoVILLoANDoP.O.-BANSKANDI oP.S.-LAKHIPUR oDIST-CACHAR oASSAM 8:SMTIoBOBITAoSINGHA oD/OoLATEoBRAJENDRAoSINGHA oR/OoVILLoANDoP.O.-BANSKANDI oP.S.-LAKHIPUR oDIST-CACHAR oASSAM 9:PREMJIToSINGHA oS/OoLATEoBRAJENDRAoSINGHA oR/OoVILLoANDoP.O.-BANSKANDI oP.S.-LAKHIPUR oDIST-CACHAR oASSAM 10:SMTIoBINAoSINGHA oD/OoLATEoBHAGYABATIoSINGHA oR/OoVILLoANDoP.O.-BANSKANDI oP.S.-LAKHIPUR oDIST-CACHAR oASSAM 11:BINAYoSINGHA oS/OoLATEoBHAGYABATIoSINGHA oR/OoVILLoANDoP.O.-BANSKANDI oP.S.-LAKHIPUR oDIST-CACHAR oASSAM Page No.# 3/5 12:RONO SINGHA S/O LATE BHAGYABATI SINGHA R/O VILL AND P.O.-BANSKANDI P.S.-LAKHIPUR DIST-CACHAR ASSAM 13:SANATOMBA SINGHA S/O LATE BHAGYABATI SINGHA R/O VILL AND P.O.-BANSKANDI P.S.-LAKHIPUR DIST-CACHAR ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D MOZUMDER Advocate for the Respondent : BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.