VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Amulya Deka v. The State of Assam and 4 Ors

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
10 December 2024
Bench
Nelson Sailoauthor
Case no.
WP(C) 6635/2024

Judgment

ORDER Date : 11.12.2024

Heard Mr. D. P. Chaliha, learned Senior Counsel, assisted by Ms. M. Roy learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. C. K. Baurah, learned Government Advocate for respondent Nos. 1, 3 and 4 and Mr. J. Handique, learned counsel for the respondent No.2. Having regard to the projection made by the petitioner, the writ petition is taken up for disposal at this stage. It is the case of the petitioner that he has been selected for appointment to the post of Gaon Pradhan of Lat No.2, Baruwati and Batabari village in Lat No.2 under Dhing Revenue Circle. However, the private respondent No.5 had earlier filed W.P.(C) No.4561/2023, claiming appointment to the said post. The writ petition was disposed of vide order dated 11.08.2023 by directing that the appeal preferred by the petitioner therein to the place the appeal before the Principal Secretary to the Government of Assam, General Administration Department, who shall dispose of the same by way of a speaking order within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order. Since the said appeal has not been disposed of till date, the present petitioner contents that his appointment as Gaon Pradhan has been kept on hold and therefore prays that the appellate authority, who is now the Director of Land records and Surveys Etc, Assam since 01.02.2024 be Page No.# 3/3 directed to dispose of the pending appeal within a time frame. Having considered the limited prayer of the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 i.e. the Director of Land Record and Surveys Etc, Assam to consider and dispose of the appeal, if not already disposed within a period of 2(two) months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order. The writ petition stands disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010261122024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/6635/2024o AMULYAoDEKAo S/OoJUGENoCH.oDEKA,o RESIDENToOFoVILLAGEoBARUWATI,oPSoDHING,oDISToNAGAON,oASSAM VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoANDo4oORSo REPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoCHIEFoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVT.oOFoASSAM 2:THEoDIRECTORoOFoLANDoRECORDSoANDoSURVEYS oASSAM oGUWAHATIoRUPNAGAR oASSAM 3:COMMISSIONERoOFoNAGAON oNAGAON oASSAM 4:CIRCLEoOFFICER oDHINGoREVENUEoCIRCLE. 5:RINKULoISLAM oS/OoFAIZULoHOQUEo RESIDENToOFoVILLAGEoPATABARI oPOoSONARIGAON oDISToNAGAON oASSAo AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMR.oDoPoCHALIHA,oMSoMoROY,MR.oUoPoCHALIHAo Page No.# 2/3 Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.