VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Jahidul Islam and 2 Ors v. The State of Assam

Allowed
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
23 January 2024
Bench
Robin Phukanauthor
Case no.
AB 3937/2023

Judgment

ORDER

24.01.2024 Heard Mr. R. Ali, learned counsel for the applicants and also heard Mr. R.J. Baruah, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam, appearing for the State respondent.

¶2Apprehending arrest in connection with Howly P.S. Case No.188/2023, under Section 120(B)/448/294/325/353/506 IPC, this application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is preferred by three applicants, namely, Jahidul Islam, Razina Begum and Jaytan Nessa, for grant of pre-arrest bail.

¶3It is to be noted here that the aforementioned case has been registered on the basis of an FIR lodged by one Talebar Rahman on 06.11.2023. The essence of allegation made in the aforesaid FIR is that on 31.10.2023, at about 12:15 p.m., accused Jahidul Islam, Rezina Begum and Jaytan Nessa entered into the school premises and rebuked him with abusive words and also assaulted him. As a result of which he sustained injuries over his head and face and also attempted to kill him and thereafter, ousted him from the school premises.

¶4Mr. Ali, learned counsel for the applicants submits that this Court vide order dated

22.11.2023, was pleased to grant the privilege of interim pre-arrest bail to applicant Nos.2 and 3, namely, Razina Begum and Jaytan Nessa, respectively, and accordingly, those two applicants have appeared before the I.O. and they have been cooperating with the investigating agency. However, Mr. Ali submits that as the applicant No.1, namely, Jahidul Islam was not granted the privilege of interim pre-arrest bail, he was arrested by police and forwarded to the jail hazot and as such, Mr. Ali is pressing this application only in respect of applicant Nos.2 and 3, namely, Razina Begum and Jaytan Nessa, respectively. Mr. Ali further submits that the applicant Nos.2 and 3 have been cooperating with the Page No.# 3/3 investigating agency and therefore, it is contended to make the interim order dated

22.11.2023 absolute, in the same terms and conditions.

¶5Whereas Mr. R.J. Baruah, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam, submits that in the meantime, the I.O. has completed investigation and submitted charge-sheet, being Charge-Sheet

No.158/2023,

dated

30.11.2023,

under

Section 120(B)/448/294/323/353/506 IPC.

¶6Since, after completion of investigation the I.O. has submitted charge-sheet against the applicants, this Court is inclined to dispose of this application by directing the applicant Nos.2 and 3, namely, Razina Begum and Jaytan Nessa to appear before the learned Court below on or before 09.02.2024, and to apply for regular bail and in the event of filing such an application, the learned Court below shall consider the same in accordance with law. Till then, interim order dated 22.11.2023, stands extended.

¶7In terms of above, this anticipatory bail application stands disposed of. Comparing Assistant Sd/- Robin Phukan JUDGE

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010261852023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/3937/2023 JAHIDUL ISLAM AND 2 ORS S/O FAYEJ UDDIN SHEK R/O BARBALA P.S. HOWLY DIST. BARPETA, ASSAM PIN-781316 2: RAZINA BEGUM W/O JAHIDUL ISLAM R/O BARBALA P.S. HOWLY DIST. BARPETA ASSAM PIN-781316 3: JAYTAN NESSA W/O ABU KALAM R/O BARBALA P.S. HOWLY DIST. BARPETA ASSAM PIN-78131 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R ALI Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.