VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Taiyab Ali v. Zarina Khatun and 14 Ors

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
31 March 2024
Bench
Devashis Baruahauthor
Case no.
CRP(IO) 322/2022

Judgment

ORDER Date : 01.04.2024

¶1This is an application filed under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging the order dated 21.09.2022 passed by the learned Court of the Munsiff No.2, Dhubri in Title Suit No.148/2015.

¶2Vide the said impugned order, the learned Trial Court has rejected the application filed by the plaintiff for permitting the plaintiff to adduce evidence and fixed 29.10.2022 for DWs.

¶3From the materials on record, it reveals that the plaintiff has already taken ten adjournments and even after the ten adjournments have been granted, the plaintiff did not file his evidence on affidavit. This Court duly takes note of provisions of Order XVII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 wherein it stipulates that not more than three adjournments can be granted at the stage of hearing. In the instant case, the learned Trial Court was much lenient in granting more than what was envisaged even under the statutory regime. Under such circumstances, this Court finds no jurisdictional error in the order dated

21.09.2022 passed in Title Suit No.148/2015. Accordingly, the instant petition therefore stands dismissed.

¶4The interim order dated 22.12.2022 passed by this Court stands vacated and the learned Trial Court shall proceed with the adjudication of Title Suit Page No.# 5/5 No.148/2015 on the basis of a certified copy of the instant order being placed before the learned Trial Court.

¶5This Court further fixes the matter before the Court below on 22.04.2024 on which date, the parties shall appear before the learned Trial Court.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

PageoNo.#o1/5 GAHC010263332022 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oCRP(IO)/322/2022o TAIYABoALIo S/O-oLATEoISHAHOQUEoMIAH,oR/O-oBIDYAPARAoAFTABoUDDINoLANE,o WARDoNO.o10,oDHUBRI,oP.S.oANDoDIST.oDHUBRI,oPIN-o783301,oASSAM VERSUSo ZARINAoKHATUNoANDo14oORS.o D/O-oLATEoJAMILUDDINoAHMED,oR/O-oG.T.B.oROAD,oDHUBRIoTOWN,oWARD NO.o9,oP.S.oANDoDIST.oDHUBRI,oPIN-o783301,oASSAM 2:JAHANARAoKHATUN oD/O-oLATEoJAMILUDDINoAHMED oR/O-oG.T.B.oROAD oDHUBRIoTOWN 3:ROHIDAoKHATUN oD/O-oLATEoJAMILUDDINoAHMED oR/O-oG.T.B.oROAD oDHUBRIoTOWN 4:ZAHIDAoKHATUNo@oZAHIRAoKHATUN oD/O-oLATEoJAMILUDDINoAHMED oR/O-oG.T.B.oROAD oDHUBRIoTOWN PageoNo.#o2/5 5:ALAUDDIN oS/O-oLATEoISHAHOQUEoMIAH oVILL.-oBIDYAPARAoAFTABoUDDINoLANE oWARDoNO.o10 6:QURESHAoNESSA oD/O-oLATEoISHAHOQUEoMIAH oVILL.-oBIDYAPARAoAFTABoUDDINoLANE oWARDoNO.o10 7:BASITULoNESSA oS/O-oLATEoISHAHOQUEoMIAH oVILL.-oBIDYAPARAoAFTABoUDDINoLANE oWARDoNO.o10 8:IMRANoNESSA oS/O-oLATEoISHAHOQUEoMIAH oVILL.-oBIDYAPARAoAFTABoUDDINoLANE oWARDoNO.o10 9:SUBHASoSARMA oS/O-oLATEoDURGAoMISTRI oR/O-oN.S.oROAD oPIN-o783301. 10:MATABUDDINoKHAN oS/O-oLATEoISMAILoKHAN oG.T.B.oROAD PageoNo.#o3/5 11:ABDULoLATIF oS/O-oLATEoABDULoMOTINoKHANDAKAR oR/O-oG.T.B.oROAD oDHUBRIoTOWN 12:SAIFULLAHoKHANDAKAR oS/O-oLATEoABDULoMOTINoKHANDAKAR oR/O-oG.T.B.oROAD oDHUBRIoTOWN 13:ATIKULoKHANDAKAR oS/O-oLATEoABDULoMOTINoKHANDAKAR oR/O-oG.T.B.oROAD oDHUBRIoTOWN 14:KHALIULLAoKHANDAKARo@oBABLU oS/O-oLATEoABDULoMOTINoKHANDAKAR oR/O-oG.T.B.oROAD oDHUBRIoTOWN 15:ARSADoULLAHoKHANDAKAR oS/O-oLATEoABDULoMOTINoKHANDAKAR oR/O-oG.T.B.oROAD oDHUBRIoTOWN oASSAo Page No.# 4/5 For the Petitioner(s) : None appears. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. S. Das, Advocate : Mr. G. Bharadwaj, Advocate BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.