VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

New India Assurance Company Limited v. Daulatia Devi and Anr

Allowed
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
17 January 2024
Bench
S. Justice Malasri Nandiauthor
Case no.
I.A.(Civil) 3547/2023

Judgment

ORDER Date : 18 .01. 2024 Heard Mr. R.C. Paul, learned counsel for the appellant/applicant and Mr. K. U. Ahmed, learned counsel for the respondent No.1/ claimant (Caveator). None appears for the respondent No. 2. This is an application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for Page No.# 3/3 condoning the delay of 248 days in filing the connected appeal against the impugned judgment and order dated 08.02.2022, passed by the learned Commissioner, Employee's Compensation, Nagaon, in NEC Case No. 16/2019. As per office note dated 11.01.2024, the addressee has not been found available in the place. However, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the presence of respondent No. 2 is not required to dispose of the matter and therefore prays to strike out the name of the respondent No. 2 from the list of the respondents. In view of the above, the name of the respondent No. 2 is struck off from the array of the respondents. The learned counsel for the applicant has explained the causes of delay in this application and which is not objected by the learned counsel for the respondent No. 1/ claimant. Considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, the prayer to condone the delay is allowed. The delay of 248 days is, therefore, condoned. The Registry is directed to register the connected appeal and list the matter for admission after two weeks. The I.A. stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010265712023 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oI.A.(Civil)/3547/2023o NEWoINDIAoASSURANCEoCOMPANYoLIMITEDo AoPUBLICoSECTORoUNDERTAKINGoCOMPANYoREGISTEREDoANDo INCORPORATEDoUNDERoTHEoCOMPANIESoACT,o1956oHAVINGoITSo REGISTEREDoOFFICEoAT87oMAHATMAoGANDHIoROAD,oFORToMUMBAIo 400001oWITHoONEoOFoTHEoREGIONALoOFFICEoAToSTARoCITYoCOMPLEX,o 5THoFLOOR,oLACHIToNAGAR,oGSoROAD,oULUBARI,oGUWAHATIo781007,o REPRESENTEDoBYoITSoREGIONALoMANAGER,oGUWAHATIoASSAM VERSUSo DAULATIAoDEVIoANDoANR.o W/OoLATEoSAHEBoSAHANI,o RESIDENToOFoVILLAGEoBASANTPURoPATTI,oPOoBOKHARA,oPSoSARIYA,o DISToMAZAFFARPUR,oBIHAR,o843318 2:SRIoSANTOSHoKR.oSARMAH oS/OoKISHOREoNATHoSARMAHo RESIDENToOFoVILLAGEoLAWKHOWAoROAD oHAIBARGAON oPOoANDoPSoNAGAON oASSAMo78200o AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMR.oRoCoPAULo AdvocateoforotheoRespondento:oKoUoAHMEDoo oLinkedoCaseo:o Page No.# 2/3 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED VERSUS DAULATIA DEVI AND ANR. E ------------ Advocate for : MR. R C PAUL Advocate for : appearing for DAULATIA DEVI AND ANR. E Linked Case : NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED VERSUS DAULATIA DEVI AND ANR. E ------------ Advocate for : MR. R C PAUL Advocate for : appearing for DAULATIA DEVI AND ANR. E BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MALASRI NANDI

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.