- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 26 July 2023
- Bench
- Achintya Malla Bujor Barua, Robin Phukan
- Case no.
- WP(C) 8386/2022
Judgment
ORDER
26.07.2023 (AM Bujor Barua, J)
Heard Mr. AR Sikdar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. L Devi, learned CGC for the respondents in the Union of India as well as the authorities under the NRC, Mr. A Ali, learned counsel for the authorities under the Election Commission of India, Mr. G Sarma, learned Special Standing Counsel, Foreigners Tribunal for the Home Department, Government of Assam as well as the Superintendent of Police (B) Bongaigaon and Ms. K Phukan, learned Government Advocate for the Deputy Commissioner, Bongaigaon.
¶2The petitioner, namely, Jahar Ali was referred to the Foreigners Tribunal Bongaigaon No.2 Abhayapuri for rendering an opinion as to whether he is a foreigner within the meaning of Foreigner Act, 1946 which resulted in the Page No.# 3/5 registration of Case No.BNGN/FT/Case No. 3010/2007, arising out of Ref: BNGN P.E.No.205/07 wherein an opinion dated 01.07.2020 was rendered declaring the petitioner to be a person who had entered the State of Assam from the specified territory on or after 25.03.1971.
¶3Being aggrieved this writ petition is instituted.
¶4In the writ proceeding, the petitioner relies upon the voters list of 1966 of village Barkolia Serso in the present South Salmara district which contains the name of Ibrahim Mandal, son of Solim at Sl.No.32 and that of Badatun Bibi wife of Ibrahim at Sl.No.33 and it is claimed that Ibrahim Mandal is the father of the petitioner and Badatun Bibi is the mother of the petitioner. The voters list of 1970 of village Barkolia Serso also contains the same information and that the name of Hasen Ali Mandal son of Ibrahim appears at Sl.No.39. Further reliance is also placed on the voters list of 1985 of village Barkolia Serso containing the name of Hasen Ali son of Ibrahim at Sl.No.251, and that of Jahin Uddin, son of Ibrahim at Sl.No.253 and it is claimed that the name of Jahar Ali is wrongly recorded as Jahin Uddin and both are one and the same person. The voters list of 1994 of village Barkolia Serso contains the name of Jahar Ali, son of Ibrahim Mandal at Sl.No.531 as well as the voters list of 2013 of the same village Barkolia Serso contains the name of Jahar Ali son of Ibrahim Ali at Sl.No.187. As the name of Jahar Ali, son of Ibrahim appears in the subsequent voters list and the name of Ibrahim Mandal son of Solim appeared in the voters lists of 1966 and 1970, it is claimed that the burden under Section 9 of the Foreigners Act 1946 has been discharged by the petitioner to prove that he is a citizen of India.
Page No.# 4/5
¶5In view of the above, the matter stands remanded back to the Tribunal to enable the Tribunal to examine the voters list from the years 1966 up to 2013 in respect of village Barkolia Serso. The petitioner to produce the complete and continuous voters list of village Barkolia Serso for examination of the Tribunal.
¶6The respondents in the Home Department may also make their own verification on the aforesaid aspect, more particularly, as to whether Jahar Ali son of Ibrahim of the 1994 and 2013 voters lists and Jahar Ali, the writ petitioner/proceedee are one and the same person and submit a report before the Tribunal, if so advised.
¶7Accordingly, the petitioner shall appear before the Tribunal on 21.08.2023.
¶8The Tribunal upon doing the needful and after examining the evidences and materials shall pass a reasoned order. In the event, the reasoned order is in favour of the petitioner, the same shall prevail over the opinion dated
01.07.2020 of the Foreigners Tribunal Bongaigaon No.2 Abhayapuri in Case No.BNGN/FT/Case No. 3010/2007, arising out of Ref: BNGN P.E.No.205/07 and if it is against the petitioner, consequential action under the law shall follow.
¶9Till the reasoned order is passed, no coercive action be taken against the petitioner.
¶10Writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms.
Page No.# 5/5
¶11Send back the LCR.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/5 GAHC010268002022 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/8386/2022o JAHARoALIo S/O-oLATEoIBRAHIMoMANDAL,o R/O-oVILLAGE-oKOREYAoPAHAR,o P.S.-oJOGIGHOPA,o DIST.-oBONGAIGAON,oASSAM. VERSUSo THEoUNIONoOFoINDIAoANDo5oORSo REPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoMINISTRYoOFoHOMEo AFFAIRS,o GOVT.oOFoINDIA,oNEWoDELHI-01. 2:THEoSTATEoOFoASSAM oREPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoCOMMISSIONERoANDoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVT.o OFoASSAM o HOMEoDEPARTMENT oDISPUR oGUWAHATI-o781006. 3:THEoDEPUTYoCOMMISSIONER oBONGAIGAON oASSAM o781301. 4:THEoSUPERINTENDENToOFoPOLICEo(B) oBONGAIGAON o781301. 5:THEoELECTIONoCOMMISSIONER oASSAM Page No.# 2/5 HOUSE FED DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781006. 6:THE NODAL OFFICER NRC BHANGAGARH GUWAHATI- 781005 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A R SIKDAR Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.