VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Alakesh Baishya v. The Management of Apollo Hospitals

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
3 January 2024
Bench
Sanjay Kumar Medhiauthor
Case no.
I.A.(Civil) 3508/2023

Judgment

ORDER

04.01.2024 Heard Shri S Chakraborty, learned counsel for the applicant/respondent no.

¶1Also heard Shri A Dasgupta, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Ms. B Das, Page No.# 2/3 learned counsel for the opposite party/writ petitioner. By this interlocutory application, the applicant has prayed for appropriate orders to be passed under Section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The connected writ petition had been filed against a judgment and award dated 21.07.2023 passed by the learned Labour Court, Kamrup, Assam in Case No. 02/2022 which was adjudicated under Section 2A of the ID Act. This Court vide order dated 18.10.2023 had issued Rule and called for the LCR. This Court had also passed an interim order to the following effect:

"7. Having considered the submissions advanced on behalf of the petitioner, it is observed that the operation of the impugned Judgment and Award dated 21.07.2023 passed in Case no. 02/2022 by the learned Labour Court, Assam, Kamrup [M] shall remain stayed until further orders."

Shri Chakraborty, learned counsel for the applicant/respondent no. 1 by referring to Section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter for short the Act) has submitted that in case, there is a stay of an order of reinstatement, there is a requirement for payment of full wages last drawn to the workman. He has also submitted that the prerequisites of Section 17B has been complied with by the applicant inasmuch as that he has filed an affidavit stating that he is not gainfully employed. Shri Dasgupta, learned Senior Counsel fairly submitted that the provisions of Section 17B would be applied only if the workman fulfills the preconditions, namely, to submit proof that he is not gainfully employed by filing an affidavit. Page No.# 3/3 This Court has noticed that such statement has been made in paragraph 6 of this interlocutory application. In view of the above facts and circumstances and taking into account the objective of inserting of Section 17B in the statute which was done by an amendment in the year 1982, it is directed that from the date of the award, the applicant-workman be paid the wages last drawn by the respondent-management. The interlocutory application stands disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010270302023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) I.A.(Civil)/3508/2023 In WP(C)/6237/2023 ALAKESH BAISHYA SON OF LATE M.R. BAISHYA , RESIDENT OF SYNERGY PARADISE, BLOCK 1, C-2, 4TH FLOOR, VIDYA MANDIR PATH, BHETAPARA, GUWAHATI- 781028 VERSUS THE MANAGEMENT OF APOLLO HOSPITALS GUWAHATI, UNIT INTERNATIONAL HOSPITAL, HAVING ITS UNIT AT ASSAM HOSPITALS LIMITED, LOTUS TOWER, G.S. ROAD, CHRISTIAN BASTI, GUWAHATI- 781005 BEING REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER, SRI ABHIJIT SINGH. Advocate for the Petitioner : MR S CHAKRABORTY Advocate for the Respondent : MR A DASGUPTA BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.