- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 3 January 2024
- Bench
- S. Justice Malasri Nandi
- Case no.
- Bail Appln. 4435/2023
Judgment
ORDER Date : 04 .01. 2024 Heard Mr. H.R. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B.B. Gogoi, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State respondent. This is an application under Section 439 Cr.P.C., filed by the petitioner, namely Nazim Uddin, seeking bail, who was arrested on 21.08.2023 in connection with Sessions Case No. 95/2023 (arising out of Nilambazar P.S. Case Page No.# 2/3 No. 45/2014) under Sections 457/ 376/ 323/ 34 IPC, pending in the Court of the learned Sessions Judge, Karimganj. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that after submission of charge sheet, the warrant of arrest was issued against the petitioner and the petitioner had voluntarily surrendered before the trial Court on 21.08.2023 and he was forwarded to the jail hajot. Since then he has been languishing in judicial custody. Considering the period of detention, he may be enlarged on bail. It is also submitted that the co-accused was enlarged on bail. The learned Addl. PP has submitted that as the charge has been framed, considering the period of detention, prayer for bail of the petitioner may be considered. I have perused the LCR. In view of the above and considering the period of detention, prayer for bail is allowed. Accordingly, it is directed that the accused/ petitioner above named, be released on bail in connection with Sessions Case No. 95/2023 (arising out of Nilambazar P.S. Case No. 45/2014) under Sections 457/ 376/ 323/ 34 IPC on furnishing a bond of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand) with 2 (two) suitable sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge, Karimganj. The direction for bail is further subject to the conditions that the accused-petitioner:
(a) shall not leave the territorial jurisdiction of the learned Sessions Judge, Karimganj, without prior written permission from Page No.# 3/3 him/ her; and
(b) shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/ her from disclosing such facts to the Court. In terms of the above, this bail application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010272212023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./4435/2023 NAZIM UDDIN S/O LATE NUCHUBUR RAHMAN R/O VIL- BRAHMANSWASAN (GHANSAMAR CHAK), P.S. NILAMBAZAR, DIST. KARIMGANJ, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR H R CHOUDHURY Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MALASRI NANDI
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.