Ranadhir Dey v. The State of Assam and 7 Ors

ORDER Date : 15/09/2023

None appears for the petitioner on call. Heard Mr. S. R. Baruah, learned Government Advocate and Mr. N. Borah, learned counsel for respondents.

¶2This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner who is being aggrieved by the fact that the Village Defence Parties (VDP) have been reconstituted by the concerned Superintending of Police cum District Village Defence Officer, namely, respondent No.5, before expiry of the period of 5 (five) years and in contravention with the procedure prescribed under the Assam Village Defense Organization Rules, 1986. It is the grievance of the petitioner that under the provisions of Rule 5 of the said Rules, the Village Defense Primary Committee is to be formed by the Village Defense Officer, namely, the Superintendent of Police of the concerned district only on the recommendation of the thana and Sub-Divisional Village Defense Officers with one adult member from each family of the village or a group of villages. The prescribed age for the adult members Page No.# 3/5 for Village Defence Parties (VDPs) are between the age group of 18 to 50 years.

¶3Mr. R. P. Sharma, learned senior counsel for the petitioner appeared in the similar matters in W.P.(C)/4773/2021 and W.P.(C)/6349/2021 submits that the petitioner was a volunteer under the Dakhin Golaghatia Basti, VDP. It is submitted that contrary to the prescription under the Rules, before expiry of the stipulated 5 (five) years, the committee was reconstituted by the respondent No.5.

¶4Mr. Sharma, learned senior counsel has fairly admitted that although some of the members in the meantime have crossed the upper age limit of 50 years yet there are several members who are still within the prescribed age limit of 18-50 years. That apart, no speaking order, etc. has been passed by the competent authority as to the reasons which require reconstitution of the Village Defence Committee. Under such circumstances, the present writ petition has been filed praying for appropriate writ, direction or order.

¶5This court while issuing Notice by order dated 14.07.2020 suspended until further orders the operation of the communication dated 23.09.2019 by which the new Thana Advisory Committee has been constituted in respect of Hojai Police Station. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner this impugned order has been passed contrary to the provisions of the Assam Village Defense Organization Rules, 1986. That apart it is submitted that the names which are not recommended by the thana and the Sub-Divisional Village Defense Officers are also included in the new committee.

¶6Mr. Baruah, learned counsel appearing for the Government submits that an affidavit has been filed by the concerned Village Defence Officer, namely the Superintendent of Police, Hojai. Page No.# 4/5

¶7Upon perusal of the said affidavit, it is stated therein that some of the petitioners have been stated to have crossed the age limit of 50 years. And as such the committees have been reconstituted. No other ground has been cited in the said affidavit leading to the reconstitution of the new committee. No order passed by the Superintendent of Police of the concerned district disclosing the reasons as to why the committee had to be reconstituted is also found enclosed to the pleadings filed before the court.

¶8Under such circumstances, this court is of the view that while the learned senior counsel has fairly admitted that some of the members have in the meantime cross the age of 50 years, but having regard to the fact that no specific reasons have been cited by the respondent authorities, besides the averment in the affidavit that some of the members have crossed the age of 50, the committee was reconstituted before the expiry of 5(five) years. When the power under the Rules is available to the competent authority to replace any member who may have crossed the age of 50, without necessarily having to reconstitute the entire committee, this court is of the view that the writ petition need not be kept pending for want of specific instructions.

¶9Accordingly, this court is of the considered view that ends of justice will be met if the matters are disposed of at the stage relegating the petitioners to file necessary applications or representations before the competent authority, namely the Superintendent of Police, of the concerned districts. The Superintendent of Police, who is the Village Defense Officer, will thereafter, proceed to hear the petitioners and thereupon pass a speaking order in respect of the grievances which may be urged before the Superintendent of Police regarding the reconstitution of the committee before the expiry of the fixed tenure of 5(five) years as prescribed under the Rules. The Superintendent of Page No.# 5/5 Police will conduct the hearing and pass appropriate speaking orders by taking note of the provisions of the Assam Village Defense Organisation Act, 1966 read with the Assam Village Defense Organization Rules, 1986.

¶10This entire exercise will be completed by the Superintendent of Police within a period of 30 (thirty) days from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. Any such particulars as may be required can be sought for by the Superintendent of Police from the petitioners during the process of personal hearing. Upon consideration of the grievances as directed above by the Superintendent of Police and upon passing necessary orders, the copy of the such speaking orders as maybe passed shall be furnished to the respective petitioners as well as the other stakeholders. During the process of hearing besides the petitioner all other stakeholders will also be allowed to participate in the hearing and thereafter the respondent authorities will pass a speaking order. The petitioner will furnish a certified copy of this order within ten (10) days from the date of receipt of the certified copy and thereupon the Superintendent of Police of the concerned district will proceed to hear the matter within a period of 30 (thirty) days and thereupon pass necessary speaking orders within further 15 (fifteen) days thereafter.

¶11The writ petitions stand disposed of in terms of the above directions. The interim orders dated 14.07.2020, by which the constitution of the new committee has been suspended, will continue till such date the speaking orders are passed and served upon the petitioner.

¶12With the above observation the writ petitions stands disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

PageoNo.#o1/5 GAHC010149502021 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/2711/2020o RANADHIRoDEY S/O-oLT.oRADHIKARANJANDEY oVILL-oDAKHINGOLAGHATIABASTI oBASANTIoPALLY oP.O.oHOJAI oPIN-o782435 oDIST.-oHOJAI oASSAM oVERSUS THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoANDo7oORS. REP.oBYoTHEoCOMM.oANDoSECY.oTOoTHEoGOVT.oOFoASSAM oHOMEoDEPTT. oDISPUR oGHY-6 oDIST.-oKAMRUPo(M) oASSAM 2:THEoDIRECTORoGENERALoOFoPOLICE ASSAM oULUBARI oGHY-07 o3:THEoDY.oINSPECTORoGENERALoOFoPOLICEo(ADMIN) ASSAM oULUBARI oGHY-07 o4:THEoDY.oINSPECTORoGENERALoOFoPOLICEo(CENTRALoRANGE) KARBIoANGLONG-o782460 o5:THEoSUPERINTENDENToOFoPOLICE DIST.-oHOJAI oPIN-o782435 o6:THEoDY.oSUPERINTENDENToOFoPOLICE DIST.-oHOJAI oPIN-o782435 Page No.# 2/5 7:THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE HOJAI P.S. HOJAI DIST.- HOJAI PIN- 782435 8:SHAYAMALRABIDAS S/O- LT. BHANU RABIDAS R/O- RADHANAGAR JUGIJAN HOJAI DIST.- HOJAI ASSAM PIN- 782448 ------------ Advocate for : MR. S BORTHAKUR Advocate for : GA ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA