VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2023 › High Court of Gauhati

Jarima Khatun v. Union of India and 5 Ors

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
17 May 2023
Bench
Robin Phukanauthor
Case no.
WP(C) 8654/2018

Judgment

ORDER

17.05.2023 (AM Bujor Barua, J)

Heard Ms. D Ghosh, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. L Devi, learned CGC for the respondents in the Union of India as well as the authorities under the NRC, Mr. AI Ali, learned counsel for the authorities under the Election Commission of India, Mr. J Payeng, learned Special Standing Counsel, Foreigners Tribunal for the Home Department, Government of Assam, as well as the Superintendent of Police (B) Barpeta and Mr. PK Medhi, learned Government Advocate for the Deputy Commissioner, Barpeta.

¶2The petitioner, namely, Jarima Khatun was referred to the Foreigners Page No.# 3/5 Tribunal Assam Barpeta (7th) for rendering an opinion as to whether she is a person who had entered the State of Assam on or after 25.03.1971 resulting in the registration of F.T. Case No.1014/2017 (New) corresponding to F.T.Case No.2275/2012 (Old) wherein an opinion dated 18.08.2017 was rendered declaring the petitioner to be a person who had entered the State of Assam from the specified territory on or after 25.03.1971.

¶3Being aggrieved this writ petition is instituted.

¶4In the writ proceeding, petitioner relies upon the voters list of 1966 of village Koltoli Police Station Nalbari Mouza West Borkhetri in the Kamrup district which contains the name of Nasimuddin Ali, son of Gendu at Sl.No.51 and that of Baila Nessa wife of Nasim at Sl.No.54 and both of them are shown to be residing in the same House No.19. The petitioner also relies upon the voters list of 1970 of village Koltoli Police Station Nalbari Mouza West Borkhetri in the Kamrup district which contains the name of Nasimuddin Ali, son of Gendu at Sl.No.60 and that of Baila Nessa wife of Nasim at Sl.No.63 and also both of them are shown to be residing in the same House No.19. It is claimed that Baila Nessa, wife of Nasim of the 1966 and 1970 voters list of village Koltoli is the mother of the petitioner.

¶5To establish that Baila Nessa, wife of Nasim of the 1966 and 1970 voters list of village Koltoli is the mother of the petitioner, Baila Khatun @ Bhabila had deposed before the Tribunal as DW-2, wherein she takes a specific stand that the writ petitioner/proceedee Jarima Khatun is her daughter. But it is noticed Page No.# 4/5 that the DW-2, Baila Khatun @ Bhabila has not been cross examined by the Home Department, Government of Assam.

¶6Accordingly, the matter stands remanded back to the Tribunal to enable the Tribunal to examine the DW-2 Baila Khatun @ Bhabila, as regards the veracity of the deposition (evidence-in-chief) on affidavit rendered by her.

¶7The respondents in the Home Department may also make their own verification on the aforesaid aspect and submit a report before the Tribunal, if so advised.

¶8Accordingly, the petitioner shall appear before the Tribunal on 01.07.2023. The petitioner may also produce all relevant material/document to establish her case, if so advised.

¶9The Tribunal upon doing the needful and after examining the evidences and materials shall pass a reasoned order. In the event, the reasoned order is in favour of the petitioner, the same shall prevail over the opinion dated

18.08.2017 of the Foreigners Tribunal Assam Barpeta (7th) in F.T. Case No.1014/2017 (New) corresponding to F.T. Case No.2275/2012 (Old) and if it is against the petitioner, consequential action under the law shall follow.

¶10Till the reasoned order is passed, no coercive action be taken against the petitioner. Page No.# 5/5

¶11Writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms.

¶12Send back the LCR.

JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

PageoNo.#o1/5 GAHC010275452018 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/8654/2018o JARIMAoKHATUNo W/OoKUMUDoALIo@oKUMORoALIo R/OoVILL-oCHATAo P.S.oTARABARIo DIST.BARPETA,oASSAM. VERSUSo UNIONoOFoINDIAoANDo5oORS.o REP.oBYoTHEoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVT.oOFoINDIA,o MINISTRYoOFoHOMEoAFFAIRS,oSHASTRIoBHAWAN,o oNEWoDELHI-1. 2:THEoSTATEoOFoASSAM oREP.oBYoTHEoCOMMISSIONERoANDoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVT.oOFoASSAM oHOMEoDEPARTMENT o oDISPUR oGUWAHATIo-06. 3:THEoDEPUTYoCOMMISSIONER oBARPETA oP.O.oANDoDIST.oBARPETA oASSAM-o783001. 4:THEoSUPERINTENDENToOFoPOLICEo(B) oBARPETA oP.O.ANDoDIST.oBARPETA oASSAM-o783001. Page No.# 2/5 5:THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA NEW DELHI- 111001. 6:THE STATE COORDINATOR NATIONAL REGISTRAR OF CITIZENS (NRC) ASSAM GUWAHATI -06 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. J LASKAR Advocate for the Respondent : ASSTT.S.G.I. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.