- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 20 February 2024
- Bench
- Robin Phukan
- Case no.
- AB 4187/2023
Judgment
ORDER Date : 21.02.2024
Heard Ms. J. Aktar, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. B. Sarma, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State respondent.
¶2Apprehending arrest in connection with Jogighopa P.S. Case No. 288/2023, Page No.# 2/3 under Section 384 of the IPC, this application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the applicant, namely, Manirul Islam, for grant of pre-arrest bail.
¶3It is to be noted here that the aforementioned case has been registered on the basis of an FIR lodged by one Jahidur Rahman on 03.12.2023. The essence of allegation made in the FIR dated 03.12.2023, is that that applicant Manirul Islam, introducing himself as a Reporter, demanded money from the owner of the brick industries putting them in fear and also tried to mislead the Government officials by preparing false report of the brick industries and threatened the informant that if money is not paid, he will place more serious complaints against them.
¶4Ms. Aktar, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant had been granted the privilege of interim pre-arrest bail, vide order dated
15.12.2023, and pursuant to the said order, he has also appeared before the I.O. and he has been cooperating with the investigating agency, and therefore, a contention is being made that the interim order dated 15.12.2023, may be made absolute in the same terms and conditions.
¶5On the other hand, Mr. Sarma, the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor submits that he has not received the case diary but, as per his instruction, the I.O. has laid charge-sheet, being charge-sheet No. 267/2023, dated 20.12.2023, under Section 384 of the IPC.
¶6In view of the above, this Court is inclined to dispose of this application by directing the applicant to appear before the learned Court below on or before
12.03.2024, and to apply for regular bail and in the event of filing such an application, the learned Court below shall consider the same in accordance with law. Page No.# 3/3
¶7Till then, interim order dated 15.12.2023 shall stand extended.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010279002023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/4187/2023 MANIRUL ISLAM S/O- LATE ALAUDDIN SARKAR, VILL- SIMLABARI PART I, P.O AND P.S- CHAPAR, DIST- DHUBRI, ASSAM, PIN-783371 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M KHAN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.