- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 8 January 2024
- Bench
- Parthivjyoti Saikia
- Case no.
- AB 4210/2023
Judgment
ORDER
09.01.2024
Heard Mr. N. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P. Borthakur, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam. This application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed in connection with Chandmari P.S. Case No.294/2023 under Sections 120(B)/420/382/356 of the Indian Penal Code. Page No.# 2/2 One day the petitioner along with some other persons snatched away the ATM card of the informant. However, the present petitioner managed to run away. The provisions of Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is not made to protect the people like the present petitioner. Therefore, the instant anticipatory bail application filed by the petitioner is found to be non-satisfactory. Hence, the same stands rejected and is accordingly disposed of.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010279362023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/4210/2023 LUTFOR RAHMAN S/O ABUL KALAM R/O VILL- KAYAKUCHI BHOKUAMARI, P.S. AND DIST. BARPETA, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N J DUTTA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM – B E F O R E – HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.