- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 18 December 2023
- Bench
- Mridul Kumar Kalita
- Case no.
- Crl.Pet. 1338/2023
Judgment
ORDER Date : 18.12.2023
¶1Heard Mr. M. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P. Borthakur, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
¶2This application under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Page No.# 2/3 1973 has been filed by the petitioner, namely, Biswajit Kashyap, impugning the order dated 24.04.2023 and subsequent orders passed by learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate (s) Darrang, Mangaldai in G. R. Case No. 3787/2017 whereby non bailable warrant of arrest was issued against the present petitioner.
¶3Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is a resident of Sonitpur, however, there is a case pending against him in the Court of leaned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate (s) Darrang, Mangaldaii.e., G. R. Case No. 3787/2017, wherein summons were issued to the present petitioner.
¶4Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that after receipt of the summons from the learned Trial Court,the petitioner appeared before the Trial Court and obtained the bail.However, in the year 2021, the Court proceeding was affected due to Covid-19 and the petitioner could not appear before the learned Trial Court due to prevailing Covid-19 pandemic at that time.
¶5Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that after resumption of Court, proceedings after Covid-19, fresh summons were issued to the petitioner, however, he had not received the fresh summons and on 24.04.2023 when the case was fixed before the learned Trial Court the Trial Court issued non bailable warrant of arrest against the present petitioner without considering the fact that the summons issued by the said Court were not received by the present petitioner.
¶6Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that G. R. Case No. 3787/2017 has now been fixed on 22.02.2024 and the petitioner is ready to appear before the Trial Court and cooperate in the trial.However, he prays for an interim protection to facilitate the petitioner to appear before the learned Trial Court as non bailable warrant has been issued and the same is pending Page No.# 3/3 against the said petitioner.
¶7The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that the record shows that the petitioner at the first instant voluntarily appeared before the learned Trial Court and also considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready to face trial,the learned Additional Public Prosecutor does not oppose the prayer for interim protection.
¶8Hence, this criminal petition is disposed of with the direction to the petitioner, namely, BiswajitKashyapto appear before the Court of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate (s) Darrang, Mangaldai in G. R. Case No. 3787/2017on or before the next date fixed i.e. 22.02.2024 and to facilitate such appearance of the present petitioner before thelearned Trial Court, the non bailablewarrant issued against him by the learned Trial Court shall be kept in abeyance till 22.02.2024.
¶9With the above observations, this criminal petition is hereby disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010280682023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.Pet./1338/2023 BISWAJIT KASHYAP S/O SRI GOLAK KALITA R/O VILL- BHEBARGHAT, KALITAPARA P.S. MANGALDAI DIST. DARRANG, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR M AHMED Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.