- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 2 January 2024
- Bench
- Devashis Baruah
- Case no.
- MC 92/2023
Judgment
ORDER Date : 03.01.2024
¶1The instant application has been filed for restoration of the accompanying writ petition which was dismissed for default vide an order dated 18.11.2023.
¶2It has been submitted that on 17.05.2022, the Vakalatnama was filed by a new set of counsels but there is no reason assigned as to why the Vakalatnama remained defective. It is also apparent that on three occasions, the writ petition was listed before this Court and it was absolutely on account of the fault of the counsels who have undertaken to appear on behalf of the Petitioner which had resulted in the order of dismissing the writ petition for default.
¶3Taking into account that it was the mistake of the counsels, it would not be Page No.# 3/3 proper on the part of this Court to penalize the Petitioner for which this Court recalls the order dated 18.11.2023 and restores the writ petition to the file.
¶4Accordingly, the instant Misc. Case stands allowed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010282712023 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oMC/92/2023o M/SoGOELSoCOIRoFOAMo(INDIA)oPVToLTDo AoREGD.oCOMPANIESoUNDERoTHEoINDIANoCOMPANIESoACT,o1956,oHAVING ITSoREGD.oOFFICEoANDoPRINCIPALoPLACEoOFoBUSINESSoAToV-6,oRAMPURo GARDEN,oNEARoAGRASENoPART,oBAREILLY-243001,oUTTARoPRADESHoAND ISoREP.oBYoITSoDULYoAUTHORIZEDoREPRENTATIVEoMR.oRAKESHoKUMARo GARG. VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoANDo5oORSo REP.oBYoTHEoCOMMISSIONERoANDoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVT.oOFoASSAM,o WPToANDoBCoDEPARTMENT,oDISPUR,-781006. 2:THEoPRINCIPALoSECRETARY oWPToANDoBCoDEPTT. oBODOLANDoRERRITORIALoCOUNCIL oKOKRAJHAR oDISPUR oGUWAHATI oASSAM-781006. 3:THEoJOINToSECRETARY oWPToANDoBCoDEPTT. oBODOLANDoTERRITORIALoCOUNCIL oKOKRAJHAR oDISPUR oGUWAHATI oASSAM-781006. 4:THEoADDL.oDIRECTORoCUMoCHD oWPToANDoBCoDEPTT. Page No.# 2/3 BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL KOKRAJHAR ASSAM. 5:THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER MANIKPUR DEVELOPMENT BLOCK MANIKPUR ASSAM. 6:THE PROJECT DIRECTOR DISTRICT RURAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY CHIRANG ASSAM For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. M. Haloi, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. R. Dhar, Standing Counsel BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.