Barenya Ranjan Borthakur v. The State of Assam and 3 Ors

ORDER

09.04.2024 Heard Mr. J Patowari, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. T.C. Chutia, learned Addl. Sr. Government; Mr. K.K. Medhi, learned counsel for the respondent No. 4 and Mr. S. Dutta, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue for the respondents No. 1 & 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the subsistence allowance along with the arrears have been released to the petitioner. There is no further cause to pursue in the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed as not pressed. However, the respondent department will continue release all the financial benefits as permissible under law. With the above observations, the writ petition stands disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

PageoNo.#o1/2 GAHC010283412023 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/7458/2023o BARENYAoRANJANoBORTHAKURo S/O-oLT.oDILIPoBARTHAKUR,o RESIDENToOF-oHOUSEoNO.o4,oBYEoLANEoNO.o7,o GANDHIoBASTI,oNEARoKALIoMANDIR,o GUWAHATI-3. VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoANDo3oORSo REPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoPRINCIPALoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVERNMENToOF ASSAM,oREVENUEoANDoDISASTERoMANAGEMENToDEPARTMENT,o DISPUR,oGUWAHATI-o06. 2:THEoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVERNMENToOFoASSAM oREVENUEoANDoDISASTERoMANAGEMENToDEPARTMENT oDISPUR oGUWAHATI-06. 3:THEoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVERNMENToOFoASSAM oPERSONNELo(A)oDEPARTMENT oDISPUR oGUWAHATI-06. 4:THEoPRINCIPALoACCOUNTANToGENERALo(AoANDoE) oASSAM oMAIDAMGAON oGUWAHATI-o29o AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMR.oJoPATOWARYo AdvocateoforotheoRespondento:oSC,oREVENUEoo Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA