- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 9 January 2024
- Bench
- Robin Phukan
- Case no.
- Bail Appln. 4583/2023
Judgment
ORDER
10.01.2024
Heard Mr. M.I. Hussain, learned counsel for the accused and Mr. R.J. Barua, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State respondent.
¶2This application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, is preferred by accused namely, Ali Hussain, who has been languishing in jail hazot since 17.11.2023, in connection with the Bongaigaon P.S. Case No. 492/2023, under Sections 21[b]/29 of the NDPS Act, for Page No.# 2/3 granting bail.
¶3The said case has been registered on the basis of one FIR lodged by SI Sukesh Ghosh, on 17.11.2023. The essence of allegation made in the FIR is that acting on tip of he has apprehended one person at Motor Gadda and recovered suspected heroin, weighing 71.31 grms, along with container.
¶4Mr. Hussain, learned counsel for the accused submits that the accused person was arrested on 17.11.2023, and since then they have been languishing in jail hazot for last 55 days and that the quantity of contraband substance recovered from his is of intermediate quantity and therefore, it is contended to allow this petition.
¶5Mr. Barua, learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that he has not received the case diary, but he has the instruction that the I.O. has already completed investigation and laid Charge-Sheet against the applicant, under Sections 21[b]/29 of the NDPS Act, vide Charge-Sheet No. 01/2024, dated
07.01.2024.
¶6Having heard the submission of learned counsel for both the parties, I have carefully gone through the petition as well as the documents placed on record.
¶7It appears that the quantity of contraband substance recovered from his is of intermediate quantity and therefore, the embargo of Section 37 of the NDPS Act, has not arisen.
¶8Balancing the period of detention with the allegation made in the FIR and also considering the submissions of learned counsel for both the parties, it is provided that on furnishing a bond of Rs. 50,000/- each only, with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, Page No.# 3/3 NDPS Act, Bongaigaon, the accused be enlarged on bail.
¶9In terms of above, this bail application stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010284652023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./4583/2023 ALI HUSSAIN S/O KASHIM ALI VILL- RAJUPATH, BARPETA ROAD, WORD NO. 9, P.S. BARPETA ROAD, DIST.BARPETA, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M I HUSSAIN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.