- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 22 January 2024
- Bench
- Kaushik Goswami
- Case no.
- AB 4303/2023
Judgment
ORDER
23.01.2024
Heard Mr. A. Alam, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. D. Das, learned Addl. P.P for the State. This is an application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for pre-arrest bail to the petitioners namely Sh. Jaynal Abdin Molik @ Joynal Abdin and Sh. Rafiqul Islam in connection with Dhing P.S. Case No. 201/2023 registered under Section 341/384/325/307/34 of the IPC. The case of the prosecution in brief is that the accused petitioners on
07.11.2023 came to the house of the informant and demanded Rs. 50,000/- for settling the pending property disputes and since the informant did not pay the amount to them, they entered into an altercation with the informant's husband and threatened to kill him and left. It is further alleged that at about after two hours at around 11:15 AM, when the informant's husband reached the front of the house of the accused No. 2, the accused/petitioner Nos. 2 & 3 intercepted him and assaulted him by iron pipe on head and hand causing serious injuries. Accordingly, a case has been registered. Apprehending arrest, the petitioners have preferred the instant anticipatory bail application. The Case Diary called for is received and placed before the Court. I have heard the submissions made at the bar and I have also perused the Page No.# 3/3 Case Diary placed before this Court. It appears from the Case Diary that the accused/petitioners have severely assaulted the informant's husband in the face and the medical report is also available on record indicating the same. Considering the gravity of the offence, nature of allegations, this Court is not inclined to grant pre-arrest bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the application stands rejected. Return the Case Diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010287932023 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oAB/4303/2023o JAYNALoABDINoMOLLIKo@oJOYNALoABDINoANDoANRo S/OoABDULoREJAKoMOLLIKo R/OoVILL-oPANBARI,oP.S.oDHINGo DIST.oNAGAON,oASSAM 2:oRAFIQULoISLAM oS/OoABDULoRAHIMo R/OoVILL-oPANBARI oP.S.oDHINGo DIST.oNAGAON oASSAo VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMo REP.oBYoTHEoPP,oGOVT.OFoASSAM AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMR.oAoALAMo AdvocateoforotheoRespondento:oPP,oASSAMoo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.