- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 9 January 2024
- Bench
- Parthivjyoti Saikia
- Case no.
- I.A.(Civil) 3880/2023
Judgment
PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010209502023 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o ooI.A.(Civil)/3880/2023 M/SoLIBERTYoVIDEOCONoGENERALoINSURANCEoCOMPANYoLTD. HAVINGoITSoREGISTEREDoANDoHEADoOFFICEoATo10THoFLOOR oTOWERoA oPENINSULAoBUSINESSoPARK oGANPATRAOoKADAMoMARG oLOWERoPARELo(WEST)oMUMBAI-400013 oMAHARASHTRAoANDoITSoBRANCHoOFFICEoAToFIRSToFLOOR oGANAPATIoENCLAVE oBORAoSERVICE oGSoROAD oGUWAHATIo oKAMRUPoMoASSAMo781007 oVERSUS SAMITONoBEGOMoANDo5oORS. W/OoENUSHoMULLAHo@oINNACHoALIo@oEUNNSHoMULLA oRESIDENToOFoVILLAGEoKHOPNIoKUCHI oPOoKHAPENIKUCHI oPSoHAJO oDSIToKAMRUP oASSAMo781102 2:YASMINAoPRABIN D/OoENUSHoMULLAHo@oINNACHoALIo@oEUNNSHoMULLA o RESIDENToOFoVILLAGEoKHOPNIoKUCHI oPOoKHAPENIKUCHI oPSoHAJO oDSIToKAMRUP oASSAMo781102 o3:SALIMAoBEGUM D/OoENUSHoMULLAHo@oINNACHoALIo@oEUNNSHoMULLA PageoNo.#o2/3 o RESIDENToOFoVILLAGEoKHOPNIoKUCHI oPOoKHAPENIKUCHI oPSoHAJO oDSIToKAMRUP oASSAMo781102 o4:DHALIoKHATUN W/OoMD.oIYAKUBoMULLA o MOTHERoOFoENUSHoMULLAHo@oINNACHoALIo@oEUNNSHoMULLA o RESIDENToOFoVILLAGEoKHOPNIoKUCHI oPOoKHAPENIKUCHI oPSoHAJO oDSIToKAMRUP oASSAMo781102 o5:MD.oRAJIBoALI S/OoMD.oHAJARAToALI o RESIDENToOFoVILAGEoKHOPNIoKUCHI oPOoKHAPENIKUCHI oPSoHAJO oDISToKAMRUPoMoASSAMo781102 o6:MDoIYAKUBoMULLA FATHERoOFoLATEoENUSHoMULLAHo@oINNACHoALIo@oEUNNSHoMULLA o RESIDENToOFoVILLAGEoKHOPNIoKUCHI oPOoKHAPENIKUCHI oPSoHAJO oDSIToKAMRUP oASSAMo781102 o------------ oAdvocateoforo:oMR.oRoGOSWAMI Advocateoforo:oMR.oSoSINGHoappearingoforoSAMITONoBEGOMoANDo5oORS. ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ::kBEFOREk::k HON'BLEkMR.kJUSTICEkPARTHIVJYOTIkSAIKIA kOkkkRkkkDkkkEkkkR
10.01.2024 o Heard the learned counsel Ms. P. Borthakur appearing for the applicant Insurance Company. Also heard Mr. A. Bhattacharyya, learned Page No.# 3/3 counsel representing the claimants/opposite party nos.1 to 4. Both sides have jointly filed the present application stating that the connected MAC Appeal, which is yet to be registered, has been compromised between the parties for an amount of ₹19,000,00/- (Rupees Nineteen Lakhs) only. Therefore, in view of the said compromise, Ms. Borthakur submits that she does not want to proceed further with this appeal. The unregistered MAC Appeal stands disposed on compromise. The Insurance Company shall deposit ₹19,000,00/- to the claimants/opposite party nos.1 to 4 in the MAC Tribunal No.2, Kamrup(M), Guwahati within next four weeks. The Insurance Company shall be eligible to withdraw the statutory deposit of ₹25,000/-, which is lying deposited before the Registry of this Court. The I.A. is disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.