- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 14 February 2024
- Bench
- Robin Phukan
- Case no.
- AB 4364/2023
Judgment
ORDER Date : 15-02-2024 Heard Ms. R. Rongmei, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. R. J. Baruah, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State respondent, Ms. N. Page No.# 2/3 Boro, learned counsel for the informant and Mr. M. A. I. Hussain, learned counsel for the respondent No.2 Apprehending arrest in connection with Kharupetia P.S. Case No. 224/2023, under Sections 9/10/11(I) of Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, R/W Section 6/17 of POCSO Act, this application u/s 438 Cr.P.C. is preferred by applicant, namely, Sri Jeherul Islam, for grant of pre-arrest bail. The said case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R., lodged by one Nazrul Islam on 13.12.2023. The essence of allegations made in the FIR dtd. 13.12.2023 is that one Jeherul Islam has forcefully married to a minor girl namely, Smt.'X' aged 16 years which took place in support of the relatives of the girl and the accused , both. Ms. Rongmei, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and no way involved with the offence alleged in the FIR and that he is ready to cooperate with the investigating agency and therefore, it is contended to allow the petition. On the other hand, Mr. R. J. Barua, learned Addl. P.P. has produced the case diary before this Court and submits that the age of the victim girl is below 18 years. On the other hand, learned counsel for the informant as well as the victim girl submits that they have no objection in the event of allowing this application Having heard the submission of learned Advocates of both sides, I have gone through the petition and the documents placed on record and also perused the case diary with the assistance of Mr. Baruah, learned Addl. P.P. In view of the materials collected so far in the case diary, specially the statement of the victim girl recorded u/s 164 Cr.P.C., this Court is of the view that a prima facie for granting the privilege of pre-arrest bail is made out in Page No.# 3/3 favour of the applicant and accordingly, it is provided that in the event of arrest of the applicant, in connection with Kharupetia P.S. Case No. 224/2023, under Sections 9/10/11(I) Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, R/W Section 6/17 of POCSO Act, he shall be released on pre arrest bail, on his executing a bond of Rs.50,000/ with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority. The above privilege is, however, subject to the following conditions:
¶1That the applicant shall appear before the I.O as and when required.
¶2That the applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; and
¶3That the applicant shall not leave the jurisdiction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darrang, Mangaldoi, without prior permission.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010291582023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/4364/2023 JEHERUL ISLAM S/O LATE HANIT ALI VILL- KUWARIPUKHURI P.O. AND P.S. KHARUPETIA DIST. DARRANG, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REP. BY THE LEARNED PP, ASSAM 2:NAZRUL ISLAM S/O NIZAM UDDIN VILL AND P.O. BEEHIMARI DALGAON DIST. DARRANG ASSAM PIN CODE- 78411 dvocate for the Petitioner : MRS. R RONGMEI Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.