VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Lakshya Jyoti Das v. The State of Assam

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
4 March 2024
Bench
Kaushik Goswamiauthor
Case no.
AB 4342/2023

Judgment

ORDER

05.03.2024 Heard Mr. K.N. Choudhury, learned Senior Counsel, assisted by Mr. D.J. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D. Das, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam. Page No.# 2/3 This is an application under Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, filed by the petitioner, namely, Lakshya Jyoti Das, who is apprehending his arrest, in connection with Crime Branch P.S. Case No. 08/2023, registered under Section 120B/420/468/471/409/447 of the Indian Penal Code. The case diary as called for is placed before the court. It may be mentioned that by order dated 22.12.2023, this court granted the privilege of interim pre-arrest bail to the petitioner, subject to conditions. Mr. D. Das, learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that the case diary shows that the petitioner appeared before the Investigating Officer and got his statement recorded on 02.01.2024 under Section 161 Cr.P.C. as per the interim pre-arrest bail granted earlier. Mr. D. Das, learned Additional Public Prosecutor further submits that the statements of large number of witnesses have already been recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. This court finds that custodial interrogation of the petitioner may not be required in the interest of the ongoing investigation into the case. Accordingly, the interim pre-arrest bail granted, by the order dated

22.12.2023, is hereby made absolute, subject to the following conditions:-

(i) the petitioner shall co-operate in the investigation and shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when so required by the Trial Court;

(ii) the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to the informant or to any other persons who may be acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade such person from deposing against the petitioners in the pending trial against them;

(iii) the trial court may impose any additional condition if it deems fit to Page No.# 3/3 do so for the sake of fair trial against the petitioner; and

(iv) the petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of the learned trial court without prior leave of the learned trial court. Return the case diary. This disposes of the anticipatory bail application.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010292762023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/4342/2023 LAKSHYA JYOTI DAS ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COMMISSIONER, NAGAON, S/O LATE KAN CHANDRA DAS RESIDENT OF UNIQUE TOWE KHANAPARA, PO DISPUR , DIST KAMRUP M ASSAM 781022 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY PP ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. I H SAIKIA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.