VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Umesh Rai v. Union of India,

Closed
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
7 January 2024
Bench
S. Justice Susmita Phukan Khaundauthor
Case no.
Bail Appln. 4685/2023

Judgment

ORDER Date : 08-01-2024 Heard Mr. H.C. Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioner Umeh Rai, Mr. K.K. Parashar, learned CGC for N.F. Railway. The petitioner has filed this application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure as he is behind bars since 01.12.2023 in connection with Page No.# 2/3 RPF/Post/NGC Case No. 28/2023 under Section 3(a) Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act corresponding to C.R. No. 58/2023. I have considered the submissions at the bar. It is submitted that the petitioner was apprehended while transporting railway scrap materails in the vehicle bearing registration No. AS-01-CC-3028. It is submitted that a total quantity more than 100 tons of iron scrap materials were being transported through the vehicle. It is also submitted by the learned CGC N.F. Railway Mr. K.K. Parashar that there are incriminating materials that the petitioner was carrying the scrap materials. I have considered the submissions on behalf of the petitioner that he was working for the owner of the vehicle and as per the instruction of the owner, he had carried iron scrap materials from the scrap godown (damp) of one Rafiqul Islam. I have perused the case diary. Indeed there are incriminating materials that the petitioner was transporting railway scrap materials. However, investigation has progressed to a considerable extent. The petitioner has pledged to cooperate with the remaining part of the investigation. The petitioner is a local resident. Considering all aspects, petition is allowed. The petitioner is enlarged on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand) with a suitable surety of like amount to the satisfaction of learned Special Railway Magistrate under the conditions:

(1) The petitioner shall refrain from such activities with which he is alleged. Page No.# 3/3

(2) The petitioner shall cooperate with the remaining part of the investigation. On breach of any of the bail conditions, bail order shall stand cancelled. Bail Application stands disposed of in the above terms.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010293142023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./4685/2023 UMESH RAI S/O DEVENDRA RAI, PRESENT RESIDENT C/O SRI PRAMOD SINGH, BORAGAON, NEAR BARAGAON CITY DHABA, BEL GOLLY, GUWAHATI. PERMANENT ADDRESS BARATI BISANPUR CHAKALE, P.S. RAJAPAKAR, DIST. BAISHALI, BIHAR. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY G.M., LAW N.F. RAILWAY, MALIGAON, GUWAHATI Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. H C SARMA Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I. BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.