- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 4 February 2024
- Bench
- Susmita Phukan Khaund
- Case no.
- Bail Appln. 4703/2023
Judgment
ORDER
05.02.2024 Heard Mr S Nawaz, learned counsel for the petitioner, Bhadra Dohutia.
¶2The petitioner has filed this application under Section 439 CrPC, with prayer for bail as he is behind bars for 327 days, in connection with NDPS Case No. 35/2023, arising out of Khatkhati PS Case No. 26/2023, under Sections 21(c)/29 of the NDPS Act. Page No.# 2/3
¶3Heard Mr B B Gogoi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam.
¶4It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that charge was framed on 28.07.2023 and thereafter, 15 days have passed, but not a single witness has been examined.
¶5The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has raised objection against the petition stating that the rigours of Section 37 of the NDPS Act acts as an embargo and he has submitted to reject the bail petition.
¶6The allegation against the petitioner is that he was caught with 625.74 grams of heroin in the vehicle bearing Registration No. AS-02-G-4447 and he was the driver of the vehicle.
¶7The petitioner is booked under a serious offence.
¶8It is true that trial has been delayed to an extent, but at the same time, it cannot be opined that the trial has been procrastinated to such an extent, which may result in infringement of the personal liberty of the petitioner, at this juncture. However, further delay of the trial may result in infringement of personal liberty of the petitioner.
¶9Petition with prayer for bail is rejected at this stage, as the rigours under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, comes into play. However, the learned trial Court is directed to expedite the trial for speedy disposal of the case, by resorting to Section 309 of the CrPC Page No.# 3/3 and fixing block dates for examination of the witnesses. The petitioner is at liberty to file fresh bail petition, if trial is procrastinated any further.
¶10Bail Application stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010293972023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./4703/2023 BHADRA DOHUTIA S/O AKHESWAR DOHUTIA R/O VILL- 1 NO. SORU MECHAI P.S. KAKOPATHER, DIST. TINSUKIA, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM TO BE REP. BY THE LEARNED PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR SARFRAZ NAWAZ Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.