Smti. Meyatola v. The State of Nagaland and 3 Ors

ORDER Date : 18.06.2024

Heard Mr. Toshi O. Longkumer, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. E. Thiba Phom, learned Govt. Advocate appearing for all the respondents.

¶2The petitioner was appointed as a Work-charged Skilled Khalasi on a fixed pay of Rs.540/- per month by an Office order dated 10th of February, 1992, issued by the Executive Engineer, PHED Division, Wokha. Thereafter, by an Office Order dated 18th of December, 1995, issued by the Addl. Chief Engineer, PHED, Nagaland, the service of the petitioner was promoted to Work-charged Skilled Khalasi in the scale pay of Rs. 800-1475/- per month. The case of the petitioner is that she has been serving for the last 32 years and 4 months as a Work-charged Skilled Khalasi. The further case of the petitioner is that the Personnel and Administrative reforms Department (Administrative Reforms Branch), Govt. of Nagaland has issued an Office Memorandum dated 17th of March, 2015, providing for a Scheme for regularization and absorption of Work-charged and Casual Employees and revision of pay/wages. In the said Office Memorandum dated 17th of March, 2015 it is provided that all existing Work-charged and Casual Employees of various Departments who are enjoying scale pay and who have completed 30 (thirty) years or more continuous service as on 01.01.2015 will be regularized by conversion of their posts into Page No.# 3/4 regular ones personal to them and subject to fulfillment of conditions as indicated in the said O.M.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as the petitioner has completed 32 years and 4 months as Work-charged Skilled Khalasi on regular scale of pay, the case of the petitioner should be regularized in terms of the Office Memorandum dated 17th of March. 2015. It is also submitted that the petitioner will be retiring in the month of February, 2027 and therefore, it is imperative on the part of the State respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization in terms of the office Memorandum 17th of March, 2015.

¶4No counter affidavit has been filed by the State respondents. However, Mr. E. Thiba Phom, learned Govt. Advocate submits that as the State respondents has issued the Office Memorandum dated 17th of March, 2015, wherein, certain conditions has been given for regularization of services of both Work-charged and casual employees of various Departments who are enjoying scale pay, the matter may be remanded to the concerned authorities for consideration of the case of the petitioner in terms of the Office Memorandum dated 17th of March, 2015.

¶5Recording the statement made by the learned Govt. Advocate, this Writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization of her Page No.# 4/4 service in terms of the Office Memorandum dated 17th of March, 2015.

As the petitioner is retiring in the month of February, 2027, the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 are expected to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization prior to her retirement.

¶6Let such exercise be done and completed within a period of 3(three) months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order of this Court.

¶7With the above observations and direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of.

Sd/-

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Page No.# 1/4 GAHC020006522023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : WP(C)/288/2023 SMTI. MEYATOLA KHALASI (WORK-CHARGED) O/O EXECUTIVE ENGINEER WOKHA DIVISION NAGALAND VERSUS THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 3 ORS THROUGH THE CHIEF SECREATRY TO THE GOVT. OF NAGALAND 2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY PHED NAGALAND KOHIMA 3:THE CHIEF ENGINEER PHED NAGALAND KOHIMA 4:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINNEER WOKHA DIVISION PHED NAGALAND ------------ Advocate for : TOSHI O. LONGKUMER Advocate for : GOVT ADV NL appearing for THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 3 ORS Page No.# 2/4 BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L.S. JAMIR