VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Lalenghluni v. Smt Renu Sharma and 8 Ors

Allowed
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
14 February 2024
Bench
Marli Vankungauthor
Case no.
I.A.(Civil) 25/2024

Judgment

Page No.# 1/4 GAHC030004062023

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/12/2023 Mc Donald Hill, Zarkawt, Aizawl, Mizoram Dr Renu Sharma and 14 Ors. Chief Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram, New Secretariat Building, New Capital Complex, Aizawl 2:Sh Lalthawmmawia PRincipal Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram PWD Cm Office 3:Sh C.Lalchhuana Engineer-in-Chief PWD Govt. of Mizoram Tuikhuahtlang 4:Sh Vanlalchhuana Chief Engineer (Road) PWD Tuikhuahtlang 5:Sh Vanlalchhuanga Commissioner-cum-Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram Department of Finance Page No.# 2/4 6:Sh R.Zarzosanga Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram Land Revenue and Settlement Dept. 7:Sh VL Hruaizela Director Land Revenue and Settlement Dept. Khatla 8:Sh Nazuk Kumar District Collector/Deputy Commissioner Aizawl Dist. Aizaw Advocate for the Petitioner : Ms Valentina Laldinpuii Advocate for the Respondent : Ms. Mary Lalruatkimi Khiangte for R10-12 & R14-15 Linked Case : I.A.(Civil)/113/2023 W/o Biakchunga (L) Mc Donald Hill

Smt Dr Renu Sharma and 7 Ors. Chief Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram Page No.# 3/4

Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Samuel Vanlalhriata Advocate for the Respondent : Linked Case : I.A.(Civil)/25/2024 W/o Biakchunga Late Mc Donald Hill Smt Renu Sharma and 8 Ors. Chief Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram

Advocate for the Petitioner : Ms Valentina Laldinpuii Advocate for the Respondent : Ms. Mary Lalruatkimi Khiangte

B E F O R E HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MARLI VANKUNG ORDER

23.04.2025

Heard Ms. Valentina Laldinpuii, learned counsel for the petitioner along with Mrs. Mary L. Khiangte, learned counsel for the respondent No. 15. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that she has received information Page No.# 4/4 from the petitioner that there are fresh developments in this case and has therefore, prayed for time to receive instructions. In view of the above, list the matter after 3 (three) weeks.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.