Sh. Kawlhmingthanga and 25 Ors v. The Director,(Gds Section), Ministry of Communications, Deptt.Of Posts, New Delhi and 5 Ors

Page No.# 1/4 GAHC030004952022

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case : WP(C)/15/2023

Sh. Kawlhmingthanga and 25 Ors. Durtlang Aizawl 2: Sh Thanglalmuana Thuampui Aizawl 3: Smt. Lalhmingmawii Durtlang 4: Sh.Lalduhsanga Ramthar 5: Smt. C.Liannguri Dawrpui Vengthar 6: Smt.T Darliansiami Dinthar 7: Sh Genesis Nohro Tuipang Siaha 8: Sh. K.Hmingthanzauva College Veng Lawngtlai 9: Smt. Rebecca Nianglamliani Zuangtui Aizawl. 10: Sh.Laldingliana Page No.# 2/4 Rahsi Veng N.Vanlaiphai 11: Sh.Laltlanzuala Sailo Thakthing Aizawl. 12: Smt. R Lalremruati Tuithiang Veng 13: Sh. Varsangliana Varte Ramthar North Aizawl. 14: Sh K.Lalrinfela Bungkawn 15: Smt.Lalrindiki Thingdawl Venglai Kolasib 16: Smt.Lalruatpuii Serchhip Venghlun 17: Sh. Zothanmawia Dawrpui Vengthar Aizawl. 18: Smt.Lalawmpuii Serchhip Venghlun 19: Smt. KC Lalbiakmawii Durtlang North 20: Smt Lalfakzuali Dinthar Aizawl. 21: Sh Nanglianpauva Sesih Vengpui Champhai 22: Sh KC Ramkinlova Darlawn Venglai Page No.# 3/4 23: Smt. Rosie Liani Chanmari 24: Smt.Lalrammuanpuii Zemabawk 25: Smt.Bethlehem Nunnapari Bualpui NG 26: Sh B.Vanlalvena Hnahthial VERSUS The Director (GDS Section) Ministry of Communications Deptt.of Posts New Delhi and 5 Ors. New Delhi 2:The Secretary Deptt. of Posts and Chairperson Postal Services Board New Delhi New Delhi-110001 3:The Post Master General North East-II Region Shillong Meghalaya-793001 4:The Senior Superintendent of Posts Meghalaya Division Shillong-793001 5:The Postmaster General Deptt. of Posts Office of the Director Postal Services Mizoram Div Aizawl-796001 6:The Superintendent of Posts Deptt. of Posts Office of the Director Postal Services Page No.# 4/4 Advocate for the Petitioner : Ms. Rosalynn L Hmar Advocate for the Respondent :

:: BEFORE:: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA ::ORDER::

15.03.2024 Heard Ms. Rosalynn L Hmar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. S.K. Medhi, learned CGC for the respondent. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would like to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal urging the grievances before the Tribunal in the first instance and therefore, seeks liberty to approach and file it before the Tribunal. Mr. S.K. Medhi, learned CGC does not have any objections to the prayer. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawal. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal in respect of the same subject matter. Interim order if any stands vacated.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant