- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 28 January 2024
- Bench
- Marli Vankung
- Case no.
- WP(C) 24/2022
Judgment
O R D E R
29.01.2024
Heard Mr. Victor L. Ralte, learned counsel for the petitioners who submits that the petitioners may be allowed to withdraw the instant writ petition since the petitioners anticipate a positive outcome in their instant case against the state respondents with the change of the Government. He has however, prayed that he may be allowed to file afresh, if Page No.# 2/2 so advised. Accordingly, as prayed for, the instant writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn with a permission to file afresh. W.P.(C) No.24 of 2022 stands disposed as withdrawn.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC030000802022 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/24/2022 C. Lalchuangkima and 39 Ors. S/o Zalawma R/o Puilo P/S, Khawzawl, Champhai District Mizoram VERSUS State of Mizoram and 4 Ors. Aizawl, Mizoram Advocate for the Petitioner : Ms Dinari T Azyu Advocate for the Respondent : Mrs. Linda L Fambawl (Addl.AG/GA, Mizoram) for R1-R5 B E F O R E HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MARLI VANKUNG
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.