Mizoram Ssa Teachers Association R/B Its President and Anr v. Dr.Renu Sharma, Chief Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram and 4 Ors

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC030005112023

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/17/2023 Mizoram SSA Teachers Association R/b its President and Anr. Mizoram 2: Sh Rokima Varte President of the Mizoram SSA Teachers' Association Chanmari Aizaw VERSUS Smt Dr Renu Sharma and 10 Ors. The Chief Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram, Aizawl 2:Dr Lalzirmawia Chhangte Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram School Education Dept. 3:Sh R.Lalramnghaka Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram Dept. of Personnel and Administrative Reforms 4:Sh Vanlal Chhuanga Principal Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram Finance Dept. 5:Sh Lalsangliana Director School Education Dept. Govt. of Mizoram Aizaw Advocate for the Petitioner : Ms Dinari T Azyu Advocate for the Respondent : Ms. Mary Lalruatkimi Khiangte Page No.# 2/3 Linked Case : I.A.(Civil)/13/2025 Mizoram SSA Teachers' Association and Anr.

VERSUS Smt Dr Renu Sharma and 5 Ors.

Advocate for the Petitioner : Ms Dinari T Azyu Advocate for the Respondent : Addl. AG/GA Mizoram for R1 R3 R4 & R6 Linked Case : I.A.(Civil)/65/2024 Mizoram SSA Teachers Association r/b its President and Anr. 2: Sh. Rokima Varte President Mizoram SSA Teachers Association VERSUS Dr.Renu Sharma Chief Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram and 4 Ors. 2:Dr.Lalzirmawia Chhangte Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram School Education Deptt. 3:Sh.R.Lalramnghaka Secretary DP and AR Govt. of Mizoram Page No.# 3/3 4:Sh. Vanlalchhuanga Principal Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram 5:Sh.Lalsangliana Director School Education Deptt. Advocate for the Petitioner : Ms Dinari T Azyu Advocate for the Respondent : Addl. AG/GA Mizoram

B E F O R E Hon'ble MRS. JUSTICE YARENJUNGLA LONGKUMER ORDER

27.03.2025 It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner Ms. B. Lalramhnemi that they have impleaded new respondent being respondent Nos. 7-11 and the notice on the newly impleaded respondent is not completed. Moreover, Mr. Ram Murmu, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 2 & 5 and Mrs. Mary L. Khiangte, learned Govt. Advocate appearing for respondent Nos. 1,3 & 4 have also prayed for some time. Accordingly, list the matter after 3(three) weeks awaiting the appearance of the newly impleaded respondent. JUDGE Comparing Assistant